366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19560679)
1. Somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor for functional recovery of the upper limb in patients with stroke.
Al-Rawi MA; Hamdan FB; Abdul-Muttalib AK
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2009; 18(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 19560679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of motor evoked potentials in motor function recovery of upper limb after stroke.
Pizzi A; Carrai R; Falsini C; Martini M; Verdesca S; Grippo A
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Jul; 41(8):654-60. PubMed ID: 19565160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke.
Feys H; Van Hees J; Bruyninckx F; Mercelis R; De Weerdt W
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2000 Mar; 68(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10675214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive value of median-SSEP in early phase of stroke: a comparison in supratentorial infarction and hemorrhage.
Tzvetanov P; Rousseff RT
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2005 Oct; 107(6):475-81. PubMed ID: 16202820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time-course of changes in arm impairment after stroke: variables predicting motor recovery over 12 months.
Mirbagheri MM; Rymer WZ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Aug; 89(8):1507-13. PubMed ID: 18586221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lower limb SSEP changes in stroke-predictive values regarding functional recovery.
Tzvetanov P; Rousseff RT; Milanov I
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2003 Apr; 105(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 12691805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors.
Lin KC; Chang YF; Wu CY; Chen YA
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):441-8. PubMed ID: 19118130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of conventional physical therapy and functional strength training on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: a randomized phase II study.
Donaldson C; Tallis R; Miller S; Sunderland A; Lemon R; Pomeroy V
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 May; 23(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 19109444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic value of median and tibial somatosensory evoked potentials in acute stroke.
Tzvetanov P; Rousseff RT; Atanassova P
Neurosci Lett; 2005 May 20-27; 380(1-2):99-104. PubMed ID: 15854759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment.
van Kuijk AA; Pasman JW; Hendricks HT; Zwarts MJ; Geurts AC
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jan; 23(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18794218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Threshold-level" multipulse transcranial electrical stimulation of motor cortex for intraoperative monitoring of spinal motor tracts: description of method and comparison to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.
Calancie B; Harris W; Broton JG; Alexeeva N; Green BA
J Neurosurg; 1998 Mar; 88(3):457-70. PubMed ID: 9488299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can SSEP results predict functional recovery of stroke patients within the "therapeutic window"?
Tzvetanov P; Milanov I; Rousseff RT; Christova P
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2004; 44(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 15008025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers.
Hesse S; Werner C; Pohl M; Rueckriem S; Mehrholz J; Lingnau ML
Stroke; 2005 Sep; 36(9):1960-6. PubMed ID: 16109908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brain activation pattern as assessed with multi-modal EEG analysis predict motor recovery among stroke patients with mild arm paresis who receive the Arm Ability Training.
Platz T; Kim IH; Engel U; Kieselbach A; Mauritz KH
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2002; 20(1-2):21-35. PubMed ID: 12237494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients.
Lin KC; Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Chen CL; Jang Y; Liu JS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jun; 23(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19289487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke.
Kwakkel G; Kollen BJ; van der Grond J; Prevo AJ
Stroke; 2003 Sep; 34(9):2181-6. PubMed ID: 12907818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motor training of upper extremity with functional electrical stimulation in early stroke rehabilitation.
Mangold S; Schuster C; Keller T; Zimmermann-Schlatter A; Ettlin T
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Feb; 23(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 19189940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke.
Verheyden G; Nieuwboer A; De Wit L; Thijs V; Dobbelaere J; Devos H; Severijns D; Vanbeveren S; De Weerdt W
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 17876069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of upper limb recovery, general disability, and rehabilitation status by activity measurements assessed by accelerometers or the Fugl-Meyer score in acute stroke.
Gebruers N; Truijen S; Engelborghs S; De Deyn PP
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 93(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 24398579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
