These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Retrievable Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with acute deep venous thrombosis in perinatal period. Köcher M; Krcova V; Cerna M; Prochazka M Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 18242910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Late complication of a Greenfield filter associating caudal migration and perforation of the abdominal aorta by a ruptured strut. Dabbagh A; Chakfé N; Kretz JG; Demri B; Nicolini P; Fuentes C; Mettauer B; Epailly E; Muster D; Eisenmann B J Vasc Surg; 1995 Aug; 22(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 7637120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Gunther tulip inferior vena cava filter placement during treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Yamagami T; Kato T; Iida S; Hirota T; Nishimura T Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(4):442-53. PubMed ID: 16010515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Symptomatic perforation of a Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter with subsequent strut fracture and pulmonary embolization. Dowell JD; Wang W; Spain JW Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2014 Dec; 37(6):1643-6. PubMed ID: 24232041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A complication of a G2 Bard filter. Nazzal M; Abbas J; Nazzal M J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1784-5. PubMed ID: 20884241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Misplacement of a vena cava filter into the spinal canal. Cuadra SA; Sales CM; Lipson AC; Armstrong CA J Vasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 50(5):1170-2. PubMed ID: 19782513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perforation of the inferior vena cava by a recently inserted Greenfield filter. Mastrobattista JM; Caputo TA; Bush HS Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):399-401. PubMed ID: 7705675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Safety of Implantation of a Leadless Pacemaker via Femoral Approach in the Presence of an Inferior Vena Cava Filter. Afzal MR; Ackers J; Hummel JD; Augostini R Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Aug; 40(8):975-976. PubMed ID: 28213895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors associated with failed retrieval of the Günther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. Marquess JS; Burke CT; Beecham AH; Dixon RG; Stavas JM; Sag AA; Koch GG; Mauro MA J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 19(9):1321-7. PubMed ID: 18725095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Retrieval of the Günther Tulip and OptEase filters using the recovery cone removal system. Miller MJ; Smith TP; Stavas JM J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 May; 17(5):899-902. PubMed ID: 16687758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided placement of retrievable inferior vena cava filters: comparison with fluoroscopic guidance with use of in vitro and animal models. Shih MC; Rogers WJ; Hagspiel KD J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Feb; 17(2 Pt 1):327-33. PubMed ID: 16517779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Removal of Günther Tulip vena cava filter through femoral vein approach. Van Ha TG; Keblinskas D; Funaki B; Lorenz J J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Mar; 16(3):391-4. PubMed ID: 15758136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Aortic and vertebral penetration by a G2 inferior vena cava filter: report of a case. Gupta P; Lopez JA; Ghole V; Rice GD; Ketkar M J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):829-32. PubMed ID: 19406670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]