BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19561264)

  • 1. 64-Detector CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with selective catheter angiography.
    Steinwender C; Schützenberger W; Fellner F; Hönig S; Schmitt B; Focke C; Hofmann R; Leisch F
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 19561264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography--initial experience.
    Oncel D; Oncel G; Karaca M
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 17255411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.
    Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis by 64-section computed tomography: factors affecting assessment and accurate diagnosis.
    Chung SH; Kim YJ; Hur J; Lee HJ; Choe KO; Kim TH; Choi BW
    J Thorac Imaging; 2010 Feb; 25(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 20160604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment.
    Das KM; El-Menyar AA; Salam AM; Singh R; Dabdoob WA; Albinali HA; Al Suwaidi J
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):424-32. PubMed ID: 17890354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT.
    Schuijf JD; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Lamb HJ; Tuinenburg JC; van der Hoeven BL; de Roos A; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Schalij MJ; Bax JJ
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 17890353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of peripheral artery stent with 64-slice multi-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Li XM; Li YH; Tian JM; Xiao Y; Lu JP; Jing ZP; Sheng J; Edwin A; Wu FH
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 19376662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Diagnostic value of 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis].
    Wang J; Chen XM; Wang SH; Ye HH; Cui HB; Du WP; Zhou HL; Feng MJ; Pan YN; Lin SY
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 40(6):487-91. PubMed ID: 22943643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis.
    Manghat N; Van Lingen R; Hewson P; Syed F; Kakani N; Cox I; Roobottom C; Morgan-Hughes G
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 18489934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Non-invasive computed tomography angiography in the assessment of coronary stent patency: an Australian experience.
    Soon KH; Cox N; Chaitowitz I; Selvanayagam JB; Farouque O; MacGregor L; Bell KW; Lim YL
    Intern Med J; 2007 Jun; 37(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 17535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.
    Andreini D; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Trabattoni D; Mushtaq S; Bertella E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Cortinovis S; Montorsi P; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Pepi M
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-58. PubMed ID: 19427427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of vertebral artery stents using 16-slice multi-detector row CT angiography in vivo evaluation: comparison of a medium-smooth kernel and a sharp kernel.
    Yoo WJ; Lim YS; Ahn KJ; Choi BG; Kim JY; Kim SH
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 May; 70(2):362-8. PubMed ID: 18359179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coronary in-stent restenosis: assessment with CT coronary angiography.
    Andreini D; Pontone G; Mushtaq S; Bartorelli AL; Bertella E; Trabattoni D; Montorsi P; Galli S; Foti C; Annoni A; Bovis F; Ballerini G; Agostoni P; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
    Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):410-7. PubMed ID: 22966068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multislice CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
    Raza SA; Chughtai AR; Wahba M; Cowling MG; Taube D; Wright AR
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15109221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control.
    Oncel D; Oncel G; Tastan A; Tamci B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 18562725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries.
    Hecht HS; Zaric M; Jelnin V; Lubarsky L; Prakash M; Roubin G
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(6):820-4. PubMed ID: 18328847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Assessment with Corrected Coronary Opacification Difference across Coronary Stents Measured with CT Angiography.
    Gao Y; Lu B; Hou ZH; Yu FF; Yin WH; Wang ZQ; Wu YJ; Mu CW; Meinel FG; McQuiston AD; Schoepf UJ
    Radiology; 2015 May; 275(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 25521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography to noninvasively assess in-stent restenosis.
    de Graaf FR; Schuijf JD; van Velzen JE; Boogers MJ; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Reiber JH; Sieders A; Spanó F; Jukema JW; Schalij MJ; van der Wall EE; Bax JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):331-40. PubMed ID: 20404736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Willmann JK; Baumert B; Schertler T; Wildermuth S; Pfammatter T; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Böhm T
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):1083-93. PubMed ID: 16055691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT angiography of renal artery anatomy for evaluating embolic protection devices.
    Thatipelli MR; Sabater EA; Bjarnason H; McKusick MA; Misra S
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Jul; 18(7):842-6. PubMed ID: 17609442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.