These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19562044)

  • 1. Random Effects Models in a Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Two Diagnostic Tests Without a Gold Standard.
    Chu H; Chen S; Louis TA
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2009 Jun; 104(486):512-523. PubMed ID: 19562044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR; Poole C
    Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2384-99. PubMed ID: 19499551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.
    Ma X; Nie L; Cole SR; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1596-619. PubMed ID: 23804970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian meta-analysis of test accuracy in the absence of a perfect reference test applied to bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome.
    Held U; Brunner F; Steurer J; Wertli MM
    Biom J; 2015 Nov; 57(6):1020-37. PubMed ID: 26479506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect reference standard - a comparison of correction methods.
    Umemneku Chikere CM; Wilson KJ; Allen AJ; Vale L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33845775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hybrid Bayesian hierarchical model combining cohort and case-control studies for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: Accounting for partial verification bias.
    Ma X; Chen Y; Cole SR; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):3015-3037. PubMed ID: 24862512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian hierarchical latent class models for estimating diagnostic accuracy.
    Wang C; Lin X; Nelson KP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1112-1128. PubMed ID: 31146651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 32022315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of diagnostic accuracy of a combination of continuous biomarkers allowing for conditional dependence between the biomarkers and the imperfect reference-test.
    García Barrado L; Coart E; Burzykowski T
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):646-655. PubMed ID: 27598904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test.
    Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests allowing for imperfect reference standards.
    Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5398-413. PubMed ID: 24003003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
    Albert PS
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer using immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability-based testing strategies - A systematic review of test accuracy.
    Stinton C; Fraser H; Al-Khudairy L; Court R; Jordan M; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):148-160. PubMed ID: 33190932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random-effects meta-analysis of the clinical utility of tests and prediction models.
    Wynants L; Riley RD; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(12):2034-2052. PubMed ID: 29575170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gold standards are out and Bayes is in: Implementing the cure for imperfect reference tests in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnson WO; Jones G; Gardner IA
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():113-127. PubMed ID: 31027713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of MSI testing in predicting germline mutations of MSH2 and MLH1: a case study in Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic tests without a gold standard.
    Chen S; Watson P; Parmigiani G
    Biostatistics; 2005 Jul; 6(3):450-64. PubMed ID: 15831578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical illness for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) diagnosis in beef cattle placed in feedlots: A systematic literature review and hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis.
    Timsit E; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Buczinski S
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Dec; 135():67-73. PubMed ID: 27931931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.