145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19562442)
1. Effects of hospital and surgeon case-volumes on postoperative complications and length of stay after esophagectomy in Japan.
Yasunaga H; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K;
Surg Today; 2009; 39(7):566-71. PubMed ID: 19562442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on operating times, postoperative complications, and length of stay following laparoscopic colectomy.
Yasunaga H; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K;
Surg Today; 2009; 39(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 19882317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do the 2018 Leapfrog Group Minimal Hospital and Surgeon Volume Thresholds for Esophagectomy Favor Specific Patient Demographics?
Clark JM; Cooke DT; Hashimi H; Chin D; Utter GH; Brown LM; Nuño M
Ann Surg; 2021 Sep; 274(3):e220-e229. PubMed ID: 31425294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Surgeon Volume-outcome Relationship: Not Yet Ready for Policy.
Modrall JG; Minter RM; Minhajuddin A; Eslava-Schmalbach J; Joshi GP; Patel S; Rosero EB
Ann Surg; 2018 May; 267(5):863-867. PubMed ID: 28628561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.
Swisher SG; Deford L; Merriman KW; Walsh GL; Smythe R; Vaporicyan A; Ajani JA; Brown T; Komaki R; Roth JA; Putnam JB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2000 Jun; 119(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 10838528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.
Gopaldas RR; Bhamidipati CM; Dao TK; Markley JG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):1064-9. PubMed ID: 23261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery: a new perspective.
Yasunaga H; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K;
Surg Today; 2009; 39(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 19639432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hospital esophagectomy volume and postoperative length of stay: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Giwa F; Salami A; Abioye AI
Am J Surg; 2018 Jan; 215(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 28343611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. University hospital status and surgeon volume and risk of reoperation following surgery for esophageal cancer.
Kauppila JH; Wahlin K; Lagergren P; Lagergren J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 44(5):632-637. PubMed ID: 29548804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty.
Jain N; Pietrobon R; Hocker S; Guller U; Shankar A; Higgins LD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):496-505. PubMed ID: 14996874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-hospital mortality and morbidity after surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996-2000: the effect of hospital and surgeon volume.
Barker FG; Amin-Hanjani S; Butler WE; Ogilvy CS; Carter BS
Neurosurgery; 2003 May; 52(5):995-1007; discussion 1007-9. PubMed ID: 12699540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.
Markar SR; Karthikesalingam A; Thrumurthy S; Low DE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 May; 16(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 22089950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk-adjusted analyses of the effects of hospital and surgeon volumes on postoperative complications and the modified Rankin scale after clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in Japan.
Yasunaga H; Matsuyama Y; Ohe K;
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2008 Dec; 48(12):531-8; discussion 538. PubMed ID: 19106490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States.
Jafari MD; Halabi WJ; Smith BR; Nguyen VQ; Phelan MJ; Stamos MJ; Nguyen NT
Ann Surg; 2013 Sep; 258(3):450-8. PubMed ID: 24022437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of hospital volume on clinical and economic outcomes for esophagectomy.
Kuo EY; Chang Y; Wright CD
Ann Thorac Surg; 2001 Oct; 72(4):1118-24. PubMed ID: 11603422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Statistical modeling of the volume-outcome effect for carotid endarterectomy for 10 years of a statewide database.
Nazarian SM; Yenokyan G; Thompson RE; Griswold ME; Chang DC; Perler BA
J Vasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 48(2):343-50; discussion 50. PubMed ID: 18644481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Specialty Training and Trainee Involvement on Perioperative Outcomes of Esophagectomy.
Khoushhal Z; Canner J; Schneider E; Stem M; Haut E; Mungo B; Lidor A; Molena D
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Dec; 102(6):1829-1836. PubMed ID: 27570158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume.
Cowan JA; Dimick JB; Thompson BG; Stanley JC; Upchurch GR
J Am Coll Surg; 2002 Dec; 195(6):814-21. PubMed ID: 12495314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of Surgeon Volume on Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs Following Anterior Cervical Fusion.
Basques BA; Louie PK; Shifflett GD; Fice MP; Mayo BC; Massel DH; Guzman JZ; Bohl DD; Singh K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Mar; 42(6):394-399. PubMed ID: 27359358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Esophagectomy for cancer: clinical concerns support centralizing operations within the larger hospitals.
Fujita H; Ozawa S; Kuwano H; Ueda Y; Hattori S; Yanagawa T;
Dis Esophagus; 2010 Feb; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 19515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
