These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19562530)
21. The accuracy of an oscillometric ankle-brachial index in the diagnosis of lower limb peripheral arterial disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Herráiz-Adillo Á; Cavero-Redondo I; Álvarez-Bueno C; Martínez-Vizcaíno V; Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP; Notario-Pacheco B Int J Clin Pract; 2017 Sep; 71(9):. PubMed ID: 28851093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Validity and Reliability between Automated Oscillometric Measurement of Ankle-Brachial Index and Standard Measurement by Eco-Doppler in Diabetic Patients with or without Diabetic Foot. Ma J; Liu M; Chen D; Wang C; Liu G; Ran X Int J Endocrinol; 2017; 2017():2383651. PubMed ID: 28572819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Automated oscillometric determination of the ankle-brachial index provides accuracy necessary for office practice. Beckman JA; Higgins CO; Gerhard-Herman M Hypertension; 2006 Jan; 47(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16344373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diastolic versus systolic ankle-brachial pressure index using ultrasound imaging & automated oscillometric measurement in diabetic patients with calcified and non-calcified lower limb arteries. Asbeutah AM; AlMajran AA; Asfar SK BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Oct; 16(1):202. PubMed ID: 27784271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Oscillometric and Doppler Ankle Brachial Indexes as predictors of all-cause mortality in a Primary Care population. Herraiz-Adillo Á; Mariana-Herraiz JÁ; Pozuelo-Carrascosa DP Int Angiol; 2019 Jun; 38(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 31146512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the automated oscillometric method with the gold standard Doppler ultrasound method to access the ankle-brachial pressure index. Hamel JF; Foucaud D; Fanello S Angiology; 2010 Jul; 61(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 20211935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The potential role of oscillometric devices for ankle-brachial index measurements in clinical practice]. Járai Z; Kolossváry E; Szabó I; Kiss I; Farsang C; Farkas K Orv Hetil; 2018 Feb; 159(5):176-182. PubMed ID: 29376424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel oscillometric device for peripheral arterial disease screening in everyday practice. The Czech-post MONICA study. Wohlfahrt P; Ingrischová M; Krajcoviechová A; Palous D; Dolejsová M; Seidlerová J; Galovcová M; Bruthans J; Jozífová M; Adámková V; Filipovský J; Cífková R Int Angiol; 2011 Jun; 30(3):256-61. PubMed ID: 21617609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of the automated oscillometric method with Doppler ultrasound method to access the Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI)]. Hamel JF; Tanguy M; Foucaud D; Fanello S J Mal Vasc; 2010 Jun; 35(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 20363085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pulse oximeter plethysmograph waveform and automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer for ankle-brachial index measurement. Arnold CG; Walker JR; Metter EJ; Young S; Brady MF Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Feb; 40():162-165. PubMed ID: 33143956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Oscillometric devices vs. arterial Doppler in measuring the ankle-arm index for the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. Martín-Rubio I; Marín-García B; Romero-Velasco E; Thuissard-Vasallo IJ; Bautista-Hernández A; Abad-Pérez D Med Clin (Barc); 2024 Aug; 163(3):128-131. PubMed ID: 38643026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of three measures of the ankle-brachial blood pressure index in a general population. Pan CR; Staessen JA; Li Y; Wang JG Hypertens Res; 2007 Jun; 30(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 17664860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Oscillometric measurement of ankle-brachial index. MacDougall AM; Tandon V; Wilson MP; Wilson TW Can J Cardiol; 2008 Jan; 24(1):49-51. PubMed ID: 18209769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) by using automated oscillometric devices. Kawamura T Arq Bras Cardiol; 2008 May; 90(5):294-8. PubMed ID: 18516397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automated oscillometric blood pressure and pulse-wave acquisition for evaluation of vascular stiffness in atherosclerosis. Massmann A; Stemler J; Fries P; Kubale R; Kraushaar LE; Buecker A Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Jul; 106(7):514-524. PubMed ID: 28168512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Atrial fibrillation influences automatic oscillometric ankle-brachial index measurement. Dąbrowski M; Lewandowski J; Szmigielski C; Siński M Arch Med Sci; 2021; 17(3):621-627. PubMed ID: 34025831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of peripheral artery disease risk in building construction workers by Ankle-Brachial index measurement with automated oscillometric and hand-held Doppler device. Verma MK; Gangwar V; Jasrotia RB; John NA J Family Med Prim Care; 2022 Jan; 11(1):139-143. PubMed ID: 35309627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of the ankle-brachial index using the SCVL(®), an arm and ankle automated device with synchronized cuffs, in a population with increased cardiovascular risk. Rosenbaum D; Rodriguez-Carranza S; Laroche P; Bruckert E; Giral P; Girerd X Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2012; 8():239-46. PubMed ID: 22566745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of the Doppler-derived maximal systolic acceleration versus the ankle-brachial pressure index or detecting and quantifying peripheral arterial occlusive disease in diabetic patients. Van Tongeren RB; Bastiaansen AJ; Van Wissen RC; Le Cessie S; Hamming JF; Van Bockel JH J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2010 Jun; 51(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 20523290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of automated oscillometric versus manual measurement of the ankle-brachial index. Richart T; Kuznetsova T; Wizner B; Struijker-Boudier HA; Staessen JA Hypertens Res; 2009 Oct; 32(10):884-8. PubMed ID: 19730440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]