These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): appropriate for studies of Friedreich's ataxia? Cano SJ; Hobart JC; Hart PE; Korlipara LV; Schapira AH; Cooper JM Mov Disord; 2005 Dec; 20(12):1585-91. PubMed ID: 16114019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of a Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Friedreich's ataxia patients according to posturography is limited. Schwabova J; Maly T; Laczo J; Zumrova A; Komarek V; Musova Z; Zahalka F J Neurol Sci; 2014 Jun; 341(1-2):64-7. PubMed ID: 24768059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reliability of the Japanese version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)]. Sato K; Yabe I; Soma H; Yasui K; Ito M; Shimohata T; Onodera O; Nakashima K; Sobue G; Nishizawa M; Sasaki H Brain Nerve; 2009 May; 61(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19514520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale: a study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Schmitz-Hübsch T; Tezenas du Montcel S; Baliko L; Boesch S; Bonato S; Fancellu R; Giunti P; Globas C; Kang JS; Kremer B; Mariotti C; Melegh B; Rakowicz M; Rola R; Romano S; Schöls L; Szymanski S; van de Warrenburg BP; Zdzienicka E; Dürr A; Klockgether T Mov Disord; 2006 May; 21(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 16450347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-rater reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS). Storey E; Tuck K; Hester R; Hughes A; Churchyard A Mov Disord; 2004 Feb; 19(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 14978674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring progression in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA): the use of clinical scales. Bürk K; Schulz SR; Schulz JB J Neurochem; 2013 Aug; 126 Suppl 1():118-24. PubMed ID: 23859347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Schmitz-Hübsch T; du Montcel ST; Baliko L; Berciano J; Boesch S; Depondt C; Giunti P; Globas C; Infante J; Kang JS; Kremer B; Mariotti C; Melegh B; Pandolfo M; Rakowicz M; Ribai P; Rola R; Schöls L; Szymanski S; van de Warrenburg BP; Dürr A; Klockgether T; Fancellu R Neurology; 2006 Jun; 66(11):1717-20. PubMed ID: 16769946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA). Yabe I; Matsushima M; Soma H; Basri R; Sasaki H J Neurol Sci; 2008 Mar; 266(1-2):164-6. PubMed ID: 17950753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Related factors of ICARS and SARA scores on spinocerebellar ataxia type 3/Machado-Joseph disease. Zhou J; Lei L; Liao X; Wang J; Jiang H; Tang B; Shen L Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Jun; 36(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 21743140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a study in 64 ataxia patients. Weyer A; Abele M; Schmitz-Hübsch T; Schoch B; Frings M; Timmann D; Klockgether T Mov Disord; 2007 Aug; 22(11):1633-7. PubMed ID: 17516493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vestibular, saccadic and fixation abnormalities in genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia. Fahey MC; Cremer PD; Aw ST; Millist L; Todd MJ; White OB; Halmagyi M; Corben LA; Collins V; Churchyard AJ; Tan K; Kowal L; Delatycki MB Brain; 2008 Apr; 131(Pt 4):1035-45. PubMed ID: 18238798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The gait variability index: a new way to quantify fluctuation magnitude of spatiotemporal parameters during gait. Gouelle A; Mégrot F; Presedo A; Husson I; Yelnik A; Penneçot GF Gait Posture; 2013 Jul; 38(3):461-5. PubMed ID: 23889886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring Friedreich ataxia: Interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale. Subramony SH; May W; Lynch D; Gomez C; Fischbeck K; Hallett M; Taylor P; Wilson R; Ashizawa T; Neurology; 2005 Apr; 64(7):1261-2. PubMed ID: 15824358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FARS-ADL across Ataxias: Construct Validity, Sensitivity to Change, and Minimal Important Change. Traschütz A; Fleszar Z; Hengel H; Klockgether T; Erdlenbruch F; Falkenburger BH; Klopstock T; Öztop-Çakmak Ö; Pedroso JL; Santorelli FM; Schöls L; ; Synofzik M Mov Disord; 2024 Jun; 39(6):965-974. PubMed ID: 38509638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of ICARS in focal cerebellar lesions. Schoch B; Regel JP; Frings M; Gerwig M; Maschke M; Neuhäuser M; Timmann D Mov Disord; 2007 Nov; 22(15):2162-9. PubMed ID: 17712842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A longitudinal study of the Friedreich Ataxia Impact Scale. Tai G; Yiu EM; Corben LA; Delatycki MB J Neurol Sci; 2015 May; 352(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 25840637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia. Tan S; Niu HX; Zhao L; Gao Y; Lu JM; Shi CH; Avinash C; Wang RH; Xu YM Chin Med J (Engl); 2013; 126(11):2045-8. PubMed ID: 23769555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]