These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1956312)

  • 1. Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects.
    Glenberg AM; Jona M
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Sep; 19(5):514-22. PubMed ID: 1956312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modality effects in the coding and reproduction of rhythms.
    Glenberg AM; Mann S; Altman L; Forman T; Procise S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):373-83. PubMed ID: 2761398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modality differences in short-term memory for rhythms.
    Collier GL; Logan G
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 10946536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.
    Guttman SE; Gilroy LA; Blake R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 15733204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of temporal coding: auditory-visual comparisons.
    Schab FR; Crowder RG
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):384-97. PubMed ID: 2761399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enumeration produces poor primacy for tactile presentation relative to visual and auditory presentation as the only modality effect.
    Gibbons JA; Velkey AJ; Partin KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):795-810. PubMed ID: 18712201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of a concurrent motor task on auditory and visual temporal discrimination tasks.
    Mioni G; Grassi M; Tarantino V; Stablum F; Grondin S; Bisiacchi PS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):742-8. PubMed ID: 26965441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory as embodiment: The case of modality and serial short-term memory.
    Macken B; Taylor JC; Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():113-124. PubMed ID: 27376662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reaction time and temporal serial judgment: corroboration or dissociation?].
    Neumann O; Koch R; Niepel M; Tappe T
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):621-45. PubMed ID: 1295274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: modality effects in order and frequency judgments.
    Glenberg AM; Fernandez A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):728-39. PubMed ID: 2972805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word recall as a function of bisensory and unisensory split-span task presentation and modality preferences.
    Smith CK; Everett FL; Westendorf DH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 724392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modality effects in rhythm processing: Auditory encoding of visual rhythms is neither obligatory nor automatic.
    McAuley JD; Henry MJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1377-89. PubMed ID: 20601718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional characteristics of auditory temporal-spatial short-term memory: evidence from serial order errors.
    Parmentier FB; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):222-38. PubMed ID: 10682299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of same-modality interference on immediate serial recall of auditory and visual information.
    Turner ML; Johnson SK; McNamara DS; Engle RW
    J Gen Psychol; 1992 Jul; 119(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 1447561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.
    Beaman CP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):371-89. PubMed ID: 12047050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?
    Hughes R; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):199-218. PubMed ID: 12669758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests.
    ZĂ©lanti PS; Droit-Volet S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.