These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1956428)

  • 1. Nursing intensity: needed today for more than staffing.
    Prescott PA
    Nurs Econ; 1991; 9(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 1956428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing intensity. Going beyond patient classification.
    Phillips CY; Castorr A; Prescott PA; Soeken K
    J Nurs Adm; 1992 Apr; 22(4):46-52. PubMed ID: 1560277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying ambulatory care activities by time and complexity.
    Schade JG; Austin JK
    Nurs Econ; 1992; 10(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 1513391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient classification in the postanesthesia care unit.
    Allen J
    J Post Anesth Nurs; 1990 Aug; 5(4):228-38. PubMed ID: 2388167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new generation patient classification system.
    Giovannetti P; Johnson JM
    J Nurs Adm; 1990 May; 20(5):33-40. PubMed ID: 2335788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ambulatory care patient classification.
    Hoffman F; Wakefield DS
    J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):23-30. PubMed ID: 3083055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nursing resource definition in DRGs. RIMS/Nursing Acuity Project Group.
    Diers D; Bozzo J
    Nurs Econ; 1997; 15(3):124-30, 137. PubMed ID: 9305112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient intensity in an ambulatory oncology research center: step forward for the field of ambulatory care--part III.
    Cusack G; Jones A; Chisholm L
    Nurs Econ; 2004; 22(4):193-5, 175. PubMed ID: 15382394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerization of patient acuity and nursing care planning. New approach to improved patient care and cost-effective staffing.
    Adams R; Duchene P
    J Nurs Adm; 1985 Apr; 15(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 3845089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different systems, different costs? An examination of the comparability of workload measurement systems.
    O'Brien-Pallas L; Cockerill R; Leatt P
    J Nurs Adm; 1992 Dec; 22(12):17-22. PubMed ID: 1469483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of an acuity system as it applies to a cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Urbanowicz JA
    Comput Nurs; 1999; 17(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 10341478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring nursing intensity in ambulatory care. Part I: Approaches to and uses of patient classification systems.
    Prescott PA; Soeken KL
    Nurs Econ; 1996; 14(1):14-21, 33. PubMed ID: 8700244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utilization of patient classification systems in Swedish hospitals and the degree of satisfaction among nursing staff.
    Perroca MG; Ek AC
    J Nurs Manag; 2007 Jul; 15(5):472-80. PubMed ID: 17576245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient classification systems and staffing. Part 2, Practice and process.
    DeGroot HA
    J Nurs Adm; 1994 Oct; 24(10):17-23. PubMed ID: 7931682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient classification systems and staffing. Part 1, Problems and promise.
    DeGroot HA
    J Nurs Adm; 1994 Sep; 24(9):43-51. PubMed ID: 8089717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient classification system evaluation. Part 1: Essential system elements.
    De Groot HA
    J Nurs Adm; 1989 Jun; 19(6):30-5. PubMed ID: 2723792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are nurses' assessments of their workload affected by non-patient factors? An analysis of the RAFAELA system.
    Rauhala A; Fagerström L
    J Nurs Manag; 2007 Jul; 15(5):490-9. PubMed ID: 17576247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of workload estimates using three methods of patient classification.
    O'Brien-Pallas L; Leatt P; Deber R; Till J
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1989; 2(3):16-23. PubMed ID: 2486682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient intensity for nursing index: the measurement model.
    Soeken KL; Prescott PA
    Res Nurs Health; 1991 Aug; 14(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 1891615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nursing: a revenue center, not a cost center.
    Budd MC; Blaufuss J; Harada S
    Comput Healthc; 1988 Nov; 9(11):24-6. PubMed ID: 10290649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.