BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19564522)

  • 1. Validity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian women.
    Klungsøyr O; Nygård M; Skare G; Eriksen T; Nygård JF
    J Med Screen; 2009; 16(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 19564522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
    Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pap smear histories in a medical clinic: accuracy of patients' self-reports.
    Fruchter RG; Rones K; Roth T; Webber CA; Camilien L; Boyce JG
    N Y State J Med; 1992 Oct; 92(10):421-4. PubMed ID: 1436809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population.
    Caplan LS; McQueen DV; Qualters JR; Leff M; Garrett C; Calonge N
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Nov; 12(11 Pt 1):1182-7. PubMed ID: 14652278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
    Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy.
    Twu NF; Chen YJ; Wang PH; Yu BK; Lai CR; Chao KC; Yuan CC; Yen MS
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jul; 133(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 16797826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlates of intent to seek unnecessary pap tests among elderly women.
    Zhang Y; Borders TF; Rohrer JE
    Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(6):351-9. PubMed ID: 17936642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sentinel Pap smears in 261 invasive cervical cancer patients in Italy.
    Igidbashian S; Maggioni A; Casadio C; Boveri S; Cristoforoni P; Sideri M
    Vaccine; 2009 May; 27 Suppl 1():A34-8. PubMed ID: 19480959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The accuracy of Pap smear utilization self-report: a methodological consideration in cervical screening research.
    Bowman JA; Redman S; Dickinson JA; Gibberd R; Sanson-Fisher RW
    Health Serv Res; 1991 Apr; 26(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 2016170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-reports of Pap smear screening in women with physical disabilities.
    Lin JD; Chen SF; Lin LP; Sung CL
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):456-61. PubMed ID: 21273042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Agreement between patient self-reports and medical records for Pap smear histories.
    McKenna MT; Speers M; Mallin K; Warnecke R
    Am J Prev Med; 1992; 8(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 1419128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in abnormal cancer screening results in the United States of America.
    Yabroff KR; Freedman A; Brown ML; Ballard-Barbash R; McNeel T; Taplin S
    J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 17626704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid in cervical cancer screening: a comparison with cervical cytology.
    Akinola OI; Fabamwo AO; Oshodi YA; Banjo AA; Odusanya O; Gbadegesin A; Tayo A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 27(7):703-5. PubMed ID: 17999297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The fallacy of the screening interval for cervical smears.
    Boyce JG; Fruchter RG; Romanzi L; Sillman FH; Maiman M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):627-32. PubMed ID: 2216192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a low-income Hispanic population.
    Suarez L; Goldman DA; Weiss NS
    Am J Prev Med; 1995; 11(2):94-8. PubMed ID: 7632456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.