These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19564695)

  • 21. The sign of the unmeasured confounding bias under various standard populations.
    Chiba Y
    Biom J; 2009 Aug; 51(4):670-6. PubMed ID: 19650054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of maximum likelihood procedures to estimate left censored observations.
    Jain RB; Caudill SP; Wang RY; Monsell E
    Anal Chem; 2008 Feb; 80(4):1124-32. PubMed ID: 18197633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Item exposure control for multidimensional computer adaptive testing under maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori estimation.
    Huebner AR; Wang C; Quinlan K; Seubert L
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1443-1453. PubMed ID: 26487053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. About an adaptively weighted Kaplan-Meier estimate.
    Plante JF
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2009 Sep; 15(3):295-315. PubMed ID: 19533346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computerized adaptive testing for measuring development of young children.
    Jacobusse G; Buuren Sv
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(13):2629-38. PubMed ID: 17133649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Regression models for public health surveillance data: a simulation study.
    Kim H; Kriebel D
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Nov; 66(11):733-9. PubMed ID: 19687020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The choice of the ability estimate with asymptotically correct standardized person-fit statistics.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 27062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Justifying and generalizing contrastive divergence.
    Bengio Y; Delalleau O
    Neural Comput; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1601-21. PubMed ID: 19018704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causal diagrams for encoding and evaluation of information bias.
    Shahar E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Jun; 15(3):436-40. PubMed ID: 19366394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests.
    Burman CF; Sonesson C; Guilbaud O
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):739-61. PubMed ID: 19142850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of misclassified correlated binary data using a multivariate probit model when covariates are subject to measurement error.
    Roy S; Banerjee T
    Biom J; 2009 Jun; 51(3):420-32. PubMed ID: 19588453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Low-level radioactivity proficiency testing program in Taiwan.
    Wang JJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 May; 67(5):687-91. PubMed ID: 19243968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The dissertation--a test which should fulfill certain minimum requirements].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jan; 98(5):464-8. PubMed ID: 11229092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimation of the phase derivative using an adaptive window spectrogram.
    Rajshekhar G; Gorthi SS; Rastogi P
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Jan; 27(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 20035304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical interpretation of a lower-extremity functional scale-derived computerized adaptive test.
    Wang YC; Hart DL; Stratford PW; Mioduski JE
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):957-68. PubMed ID: 19628577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials.
    Esposito E; Cipriani A; Barbui C
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2009; 18(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 19378694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Local independence and residual covariance: a study of olympic figure skating ratings.
    Linacre JM
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 19564696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A. priori calculation of the standard deviation and a posteriori estimation of the value of unknown parameters in virological experiments.
    Zaharia CN
    Virologie; 1979; 30(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 425318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.