BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19564825)

  • 1. Stuttering patients' opinions on the Digital Speech Aid.
    Ratyńska J; Szkielkowska A; Markowska R; Kurkowski M; Mularzuk M; Skarzyński H
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Jul; 15(7):CR355-60. PubMed ID: 19564825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey of Australian adult users of altered auditory feedback devices for stuttering: use patterns, perceived effectiveness and satisfaction.
    Lincoln M; Walker C
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 29(19):1510-7. PubMed ID: 17852243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate speech fluency improvement after application of the Digital Speech Aid in stuttering patients.
    Ratyńska J; Szkiełkowska A; Markowska R; Kurkowski M; Mularzuk M; Skarżyński H
    Med Sci Monit; 2012 Jan; 18(1):CR9-12. PubMed ID: 22207120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new antistuttering device: treatment of stuttering using bone conduction stimulation with delayed temporal feedback.
    Stidham KR; Olson L; Hillbratt M; Sinopoli T
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Nov; 116(11):1951-5. PubMed ID: 17075424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigations of the impact of altered auditory feedback in-the-ear devices on the speech of people who stutter: one-year follow-up.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J; Saltuklaroglu T; Guntupalli VK
    Disabil Rehabil; 2006 Jun; 28(12):757-65. PubMed ID: 16754573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of self-generated synchronous and asynchronous visual speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Hough MS; Blanchet P; Ivy LJ; Waddell D
    J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19304293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the SpeechEasy on objective and perceived aspects of stuttering: a 6-month, phase I clinical trial in naturalistic environments.
    Pollard R; Ellis JB; Finan D; Ramig PR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):516-33. PubMed ID: 18695013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-reported efficacy of an all in-the-ear-canal prosthetic device to inhibit stuttering during one hundred hours of university teaching: an autobiographical clinical commentary.
    Kalinowski J
    Disabil Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 25(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 12554385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate effects of AAF devices on the characteristics of stuttering: a clinical analysis.
    Unger JP; Glück CW; Cholewa J
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Jun; 37(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 22531287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The validity of a simple outcome measure to assess stuttering therapy.
    Huinck W; Rietveld T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 17337899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The SpeechEasy device in stuttering and nonstuttering adults: fluency effects while speaking and reading.
    Foundas AL; Mock JR; Corey DM; Golob EJ; Conture EG
    Brain Lang; 2013 Aug; 126(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 23712191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term effectiveness of the SpeechEasy fluency-enhancement device.
    Gallop RF; Runyan CM
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Dec; 37(4):334-43. PubMed ID: 23218216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency, speech rate, and speech naturalness.
    Armson J; Kiefte M
    J Fluency Disord; 2008; 33(2):120-34. PubMed ID: 18617052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Reduction of stuttering frequency using frequency-shifted and delayed auditory feedback].
    Natke U
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2000; 52(4):151-9. PubMed ID: 10782008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of digital vibrotactile speech feedback on overt stuttering frequency.
    Snyder GJ; Blanchet P; Waddell D; Ivy LJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Feb; 108(1):271-80. PubMed ID: 19425468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A solid state delayed auditory feedback system for speech therapy.
    Pollock R; Gregory NL; Shaw A
    Biomed Eng; 1976 Dec; 11(12):413-4. PubMed ID: 1016678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of SpeechEasy during situations of daily living.
    O'Donnell JJ; Armson J; Kiefte M
    J Fluency Disord; 2008; 33(2):99-119. PubMed ID: 18617051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of SpeechEasy on stuttering frequency in laboratory conditions.
    Armson J; Kiefte M; Mason J; De Croos D
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 16753207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Altered auditory feedback and the treatment of stuttering: a review.
    Lincoln M; Packman A; Onslow M
    J Fluency Disord; 2006; 31(2):71-89. PubMed ID: 16750562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is parent-child interaction therapy effective in reducing stuttering?
    Millard SK; Nicholas A; Cook FM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 51(3):636-50. PubMed ID: 18506041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.