These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19565252)

  • 1. Unilateral biportal endoscopic versus microscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a retrospective study.
    Arunakul R; Anumas S; Pattharanitima P; Susrivaraput C; Pholsawatchai W
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Jun; 19(1):326. PubMed ID: 38824551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Models for Surgical Planning in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Bui AT; Le H; Hoang TT; Trinh GM; Shao HC; Tsai PI; Chen KJ; Hsieh KL; Huang EW; Hsu CC; Mathew M; Lee CY; Wang PY; Huang TJ; Wu MH
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 38391650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the efficacy and complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic fusion versus minimally invasive fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and mate-analysis.
    Wang Q; Chang S; Dong JF; Fang X; Chen Y; Zhuo C
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1345-1357. PubMed ID: 36867251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Minimal Invasive Versus Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-level Lumbar Disease.
    Kim JE; Yoo HS; Choi DJ; Park EJ; Jee SM
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Mar; 34(2):E64-E71. PubMed ID: 33633061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Formica M; Vallerga D; Zanirato A; Cavagnaro L; Basso M; Divano S; Mosconi L; Quarto E; Siri G; Felli L
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 31894472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of single cage position in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through digital images.
    Zhao X; Chen C; Zhou T; Mi J; Du L; Kang Z; Huang J; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao J
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1091-1097. PubMed ID: 29430605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang H; Chen W; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():9. PubMed ID: 26754610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single transverse-orientation cage via MIS-TLIF approach for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a technical note.
    Wang SJ; Han YC; Pan FM; Ma B; Tan J
    Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(8):14154-60. PubMed ID: 26550387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of one versus two cages in lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a meta-analysis.
    Liu J; Tang J; Liu H
    Orthop Surg; 2014 Aug; 6(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 25179359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the process of creeping substitution between allograft bone and local bone grafting in lumbar interbody fusion.
    Huang H; Jiang C; Feng Z; Jiang X
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2068-74. PubMed ID: 24879581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease.
    Gu G; Zhang H; Fan G; He S; Cai X; Shen X; Guan X; Zhou X
    Int Orthop; 2014 Apr; 38(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 24240484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties.
    Vanti C; Prosperi D; Boschi M
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2013 Dec; 14(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 23660865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a single interbody cage and a tubular retraction system : technical tips, and perioperative, radiologic and clinical outcomes.
    Lee CK; Park JY; Zhang HY
    J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2010 Sep; 48(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 21082048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with one cage and excised local bone.
    Xiao Y; Li F; Chen Q
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 May; 130(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 19565252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the early efficacies of autologous bone grafting and interbody fusion cages for treating degenerative lumbar instability in patients of different ages.
    Zhong HZ; Tian DS; Zhou Y; Jing JH; Qian J; Chen L; Zhu B
    Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1211-8. PubMed ID: 26830783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness of two different interbody fusion methods for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: cage versus morselized impacted bone grafts.
    Lv C; Li X; Zhang H; Lv J; Zhang H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():207. PubMed ID: 26285579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and radiographic outcomes using local bone shavings as autograft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kasliwal MK; Deutsch H
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22120378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects on clinical outcomes of grafts and spacers used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a critical review.
    Heida K; Ebraheim M; Siddiqui S; Liu J
    Orthop Surg; 2013 Feb; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 23420741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.