72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19565932)
1. Measuring angles on digitalized radiographic images using Microsoft PowerPoint.
Jones JK; Krow A; Hariharan S; Weekes L
West Indian Med J; 2008 Jan; 57(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19565932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver variability using a commercially available system of archived digital radiography with integrated computer-assisted measurements for scoliosis Cobb angles.
Hardesty CK; Aronson J; Aronson EA; Ranade AS; McCracken CW; Nick TG; Cordell CL
J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Mar; 33(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 23389571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.
Shea KG; Stevens PM; Nelson M; Smith JT; Masters KS; Yandow S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 9530786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature.
He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis.
Loder RT; Urquhart A; Steen H; Graziano G; Hensinger RN; Schlesinger A; Schork MA; Shyr Y
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1995 Sep; 77(5):768-70. PubMed ID: 7559707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine.
Cheung J; Wever DJ; Veldhuizen AG; Klein JP; Verdonck B; Nijlunsing R; Cool JC; Van Horn JR
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 12522710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Mok JM; Berven SH; Diab M; Hackbarth M; Hu SS; Deviren V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Mar; 33(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 18344863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs.
Zmurko MG; Mooney JF; Podeszwa DA; Minster GJ; Mendelow MJ; Guirgues A
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2003; 12(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 15008284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Novel software-based and validated evaluation method for objective quantification of bone regeneration in experimental bone defects].
Schönberger T; Kasten P; Fechner K; Südkamp NP; Pearce S; Niemeyer P
Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Jan; 148(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 20135589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter and intra-rater reliability of mobile device goniometer in measuring lumbar flexion range of motion.
Bedekar N; Suryawanshi M; Rairikar S; Sancheti P; Shyam A
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2014; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 24029833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis radiographs with preselected end vertebrae: traditional versus digital acquisition.
Wills BP; Auerbach JD; Zhu X; Caird MS; Horn BD; Flynn JM; Drummond DS; Dormans JP; Ecker ML
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17202899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of spinal range of motion in healthy boys using a skin-surface device.
Kellis E; Adamou G; Tzilios G; Emmanouilidou M
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2008 Oct; 31(8):570-6. PubMed ID: 18984239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted image analysis for measuring body segmental angles during a static strength element on parallel bars: validity and reliability.
Siatras T
Sports Biomech; 2011 Jun; 10(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 21834397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements.
Srivastava S; Chockalingam N; El Fakhri T
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 20833569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study.
Carter TI; Pansy B; Wolff AL; Hillstrom HJ; Backus SI; Lenhoff M; Wolfe SW
J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1422-8. PubMed ID: 19703734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance].
Rillardon L; Levassor N; Guigui P; Wodecki P; Cardinne L; Templier A; Skalli W
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 May; 89(3):218-27. PubMed ID: 12844045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Content-based image retrieval of spine radiographs with scoliosis.
Dinesh Kumar VP; Thomas T; Menon KV
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 19494749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
