These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19565962)

  • 1. Single photon emission computerized tomography and histological evaluation in the validation of a new technique for closure of oro-antral communication: an experimental study in pigs.
    Ogunsalu CO; Rohrer M; Persad H; Archibald A; Watkins J; Daisley H; Ezeokoli C; Adogwa A; Legall C; Khan O
    West Indian Med J; 2008 Mar; 57(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 19565962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new surgical management for oro-antral communication: the resorbable guided tissue regeneration membrane--bone substitute sandwich technique.
    Ogunsalu C
    West Indian Med J; 2005 Sep; 54(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 16312195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emerging applications of an experimental single photon emission computed tomography: an analysis of 16 areas of interest in the pig's model.
    Ogunsalu C; Archibald A; Ezeokoli C
    West Indian Med J; 2012 Dec; 61(9):916-20. PubMed ID: 24020234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single photon emission computerized tomography in the evaluation of the osteoblastic activities of a new bone regeneration technique: analysis of 12 mandibular sites in six experimental pigs.
    Ogunsalu C; Ezeokoli C; Daisley H; Adogwa A; Watkins J; Archibald A; Legall C; Khan O
    West Indian Med J; 2008 Nov; 57(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 19565984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study of osteoblastic activity of same implants (Endopore) in the immediate extraction site utilizing single photon emission computerized tomography: peri-implant autogeneous bone grafting with GTR versus no peri-implant bone grafting--experimental study in pig model.
    Ogunsalu C; Ezeokoli C; Archibald A; Watkins J; Stoian C; Daisley H; Legall C; Lorde S; Jackson K; Jaggernauth D; Nelson A; Mungal N
    West Indian Med J; 2011 Jun; 60(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 22224348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Closure of oroantral communication using guided tissue regeneration and an absorbable gelatin membrane.
    Waldrop TC; Semba SE
    J Periodontol; 1993 Nov; 64(11):1061-6. PubMed ID: 8295091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical, tomographic, and histological assessment of periosteal guided bone regeneration with cortical perforations in advanced human critical size defects.
    Verdugo F; D'Addona A; Pontón J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 20491815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical Management of Oro-Antral Communications Using Resorbable GTR Membrane and FDMB Sandwich Technique: A Clinical Study.
    Sandhya G; Reddy PB; Kumar KA; Sridhar Reddy B; Prasad N; Kiran G
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2013 Sep; 12(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 24431851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bony press-fit closure of oro-antral fistulas: a technique for pre-sinus lift repair and secondary closure.
    Watzak G; Tepper G; Zechner W; Monov G; Busenlechner D; Watzek G
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1288-94. PubMed ID: 16122592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Composite three-layer closure of oral antral communication with 10 months follow-up-a case study.
    Weinstock RJ; Nikoyan L; Dym H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Feb; 72(2):266.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24321311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Closure of oroantral communications: a review of the literature.
    Visscher SH; van Minnen B; Bos RR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1384-91. PubMed ID: 20227153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of the application of solvent-dehydrated bone xenograft and duramater xenograft for the healing of oroantral osseous defects: a pilot experimental study.
    Cetiner S; Esen E; Ustün Y; Oztunç H; Tuncer I
    Dent Traumatol; 2003 Feb; 19(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 12656852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histomorphometric analysis following augmentation of the anterior atrophic maxilla with cancellous bone block allograft.
    Nissan J; Marilena V; Gross O; Mardinger O; Chaushu G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 22299083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zygomatic bone graft for oral-antral communication closure and implant placement.
    Peñarrocha-Diago M; García B; Gomez D; Balaguer J
    J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(5):305-9. PubMed ID: 17987864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sinus bone grafting for oral antral fistulae.
    Jensen OT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jan; 97(1):4. PubMed ID: 14740642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experimental study on the healing processes after the immediate reconstruction of maxillary bone defect--fresh autogenous iliac bone graft].
    Miyajima H
    Ou Daigaku Shigakushi; 1990 Jul; 17(2):168-82. PubMed ID: 2132317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of cancellous bone for closure of oroantral and oronasal defects.
    Whitney JH; Hammer WB; Elliott MD; Tucker DF
    J Oral Surg; 1980 Sep; 38(9):679-81. PubMed ID: 6997448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mathematical model for osteobstruction in bone regeneration mechanisms: a headway in skeletal tissue engineering.
    Ogunsalu C; Arunaye FI; Ezeokoli C; Gardner M; Rohrer M; Prasad H
    West Indian Med J; 2012 Nov; 61(8):814-20. PubMed ID: 23757903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Closure of a large oroantral communication by bone grafting.
    Cockerham S; Wood WH; Lind K
    J Oral Surg; 1976 Dec; 34(12):1098-1100. PubMed ID: 792403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of the osseointegration of dental implants after different bone augmentation techniques: vascularized femur flap, non-vascularized femur graft and mandibular bone graft.
    Benlidayi ME; Gaggl A; Bürger H; Brandner C; Kurkcu M; Unlügenç H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):594-9. PubMed ID: 21044163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.