These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19565993)

  • 1. Reliability of the evaluation of students' answers to essay-type questions.
    Anatol T; Hariharan S
    West Indian Med J; 2009 Jan; 58(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 19565993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
    Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of undergraduate medical student script concordance test (SCT) scores on the clinical assessment of the acute abdomen.
    Goos M; Schubach F; Seifert G; Boeker M
    BMC Surg; 2016 Aug; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 27535826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of knowledge and communication skill evaluations by written essay and oral examinations in preclinical medical students.
    Love RR; Newcomb PA; Schiller JH; Wilding G; Stone HL
    J Cancer Educ; 1993; 8(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8363938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS stage I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus).
    Pepple DJ; Young LE; Carroll RG
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Jun; 34(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 20522902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Progress testing with short answer questions.
    Rademakers J; Ten Cate TJ; Bär PR
    Med Teach; 2005 Nov; 27(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 16332547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation and evaluation of new assessments for the otolaryngology undergraduate medical clerkship.
    Woods R; Subramaniam T; Patterson A; Hennessy M; Timon C
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Dec; 129(12):1228-33. PubMed ID: 26411995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applicability and fairness of the oral examination in undergraduate psychiatry training in South Africa.
    Niehaus DJ; Jordaan E; Koen L; Mashile M; Mall S
    Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg); 2012 Mar; 15(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 22552726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessment.
    Sam AH; Hameed S; Harris J; Meeran K
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):266. PubMed ID: 27737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of medical students in final professional examination: Can in-course continuous assessments predict students at risk?
    Nagandla K; Gupta ED; Motilal T; Teng CL; Gangadaran S
    Natl Med J India; 2018; 31(5):293-295. PubMed ID: 31267998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pilot experiment on the inter-examiner reliability of short essay questions.
    Wakeford RE; Roberts S
    Med Educ; 1979 Sep; 13(5):342-4. PubMed ID: 522685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evaluation of a peer-led question-writing task.
    Nwosu A; Mason S; Roberts A; Hugel H
    Clin Teach; 2013 Jun; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 23656675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application essays and future performance in medical school: are they related?
    Dong T; Kay A; Artino AR; Gilliland WR; Waechter DM; Cruess D; DeZee KJ; Durning SJ
    Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 23330895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of medical students--repeatability of marking. Agreement between two markers of short-answer questions.
    Hammond M
    S Afr Med J; 1985 Dec; 68(13):961-2. PubMed ID: 4081934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using standardized video cases for assessment of medical communication skills: reliability of an objective structured video examination by computer.
    Hulsman RL; Mollema ED; Oort FJ; Hoos AM; de Haes JC
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Jan; 60(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16332467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of medical students in case-based and essay components of written anatomy examinations.
    Peplow PV
    Med Educ; 1991 Jul; 25(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 1890957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by short and long essays.
    Adewoye EO; Oyebola OD; Bamgboye EA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2000 Jun; 29(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 11379449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LUCAS: a theoretically informed instrument to assess clinical communication in objective structured clinical examinations.
    Huntley CD; Salmon P; Fisher PL; Fletcher I; Young B
    Med Educ; 2012 Mar; 46(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 22324526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.