These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19567315)

  • 21. Comparative evaluation of accuracy of 2 electronic Apex locators with conventional radiography: an ex vivo study.
    Khandewal D; Ballal NV; Saraswathi MV
    J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 25476973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro readings when testing the accuracy of the Root ZX apex locator.
    Duran-Sindreu F; Stöber E; Mercadé M; Vera J; Garcia M; Bueno R; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 22244644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determining the apical terminus of root-end resected teeth using three modern apex locators: a comparative ex vivo study.
    ElAyouti A; Kimionis I; Chu AL; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Nov; 38(11):827-33. PubMed ID: 16218976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Brigante L; Lesti B; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2006 May; 39(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 16640641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption.
    Angwaravong O; Panitvisai P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Feb; 42(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19134039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electronic apex locator: a useful tool for root canal treatment in the primary dentition.
    Katz A; Mass E; Kaufman AY
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(6):414-7. PubMed ID: 9017174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro comparison of three electronic apex locators.
    Guise GM; Goodell GG; Imamura GM
    J Endod; 2010 Feb; 36(2):279-81. PubMed ID: 20113790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators.
    Pascon EA; Marrelli M; Congi O; Ciancio R; Miceli F; Versiani MA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e147-51. PubMed ID: 19716484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Extended apical enlargement with hand files versus rotary NiTi files. Part II.
    Bartha T; Kalwitzki M; Löst C; Weiger R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):692-7. PubMed ID: 17052649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vivo determination of root canal length: a preliminary report using the Tri Auto ZX apex-locating handpiece.
    Grimberg F; Banegas G; Chiacchio L; Zmener O
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jul; 35(7):590-3. PubMed ID: 12190898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.
    Somma F; Castagnola R; Lajolo C; Paternò Holtzman L; Marigo L
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 22257341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An in vivo evaluation of an electronic apex locator that uses the ratio method in vital and necrotic canals.
    Dunlap CA; Remeikis NA; BeGole EA; Rauschenberger CR
    J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 9487868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in apical transportation.
    Javaheri HH; Javaheri GH
    J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 17320715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of sodium hypochlorite irrigation on the accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator.
    Meares WA; Steiman HR
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):595-8. PubMed ID: 12184422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth.
    Leonardo MR; Silva LA; Nelson-Filho P; Silva RA; Raffaini MS
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 18217990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of cervical preflaring using different rotary nickel-titanium systems on the accuracy of apical file size determination.
    Tennert C; Herbert J; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT
    J Endod; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1669-72. PubMed ID: 20850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
    Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An in vivo evaluation of Root ZX electronic apex locator.
    Shabahang S; Goon WW; Gluskin AH
    J Endod; 1996 Nov; 22(11):616-8. PubMed ID: 9198419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.