484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19567688)
1. Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences.
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 35(7):410-4. PubMed ID: 19567688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parental duties and prenatal screening: does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
Midwifery; 2012 Dec; 28(6):e837-43. PubMed ID: 22079009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Feb; 28(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18186151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening.
van den Berg M; Timmermans DR; ten Kate LP; van Vugt JM; van der Wal G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 16242899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions.
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):461-5. PubMed ID: 21429958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of ethical beliefs on decisions about prenatal screening tests: searching for justification.
García E; Timmermans DR; van Leeuwen E
Soc Sci Med; 2008 Feb; 66(3):753-64. PubMed ID: 17996350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening.
Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient decision-making for clinical genetics.
Anderson G
Nurs Inq; 2007 Mar; 14(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 17298604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenging the rhetoric of choice in prenatal screening.
Seavilleklein V
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 19076943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A meta-synthesis of pregnant women's decision-making processes with regard to antenatal screening for Down syndrome.
Reid B; Sinclair M; Barr O; Dobbs F; Crealey G
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(11):1561-73. PubMed ID: 19783085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Sharma G; Davis J; Gross S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jul; 199(1):19.e1-4. PubMed ID: 18355783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent: providing information about prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 17260215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge of prenatal screening and psychological management of test decisions.
Dahl K; Hvidman L; Jørgensen FS; Kesmodel US
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 20954167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: attitudes, knowledge and information concerning prenatal examinations.
Dahl K; Kesmodel U; Hvidman L; Olesen F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(12):1414-9. PubMed ID: 17260214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision-making in palliative care practice and the need for moral deliberation: a qualitative study.
Hermsen M; ten Have H
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Mar; 56(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 15721968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making?
Hunt LM; de Voogd KB; Castañeda H
Patient Educ Couns; 2005 Mar; 56(3):302-12. PubMed ID: 15721973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision?
Blomberg K; Ternestedt BM; Törnberg S; Tishelman C
Psychooncology; 2008 Jun; 17(6):561-9. PubMed ID: 17886262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal screening: current practice, new developments, ethical challenges.
de Jong A; Maya I; van Lith JM
Bioethics; 2015 Jan; 29(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25521968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.
Bekker HL; Hewison J; Thornton JG
Prenat Diagn; 2004 Apr; 24(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 15065100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical decision-making in prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: a qualitative survey among physicians and midwives.
Garel M; Gosme-Seguret S; Kaminski M; Cuttini M
Prenat Diagn; 2002 Sep; 22(9):811-7. PubMed ID: 12224077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
