271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19569182)
1. A fast method for large-scale de novo peptide and miniprotein structure prediction.
Maupetit J; Derreumaux P; Tufféry P
J Comput Chem; 2010 Mar; 31(4):726-38. PubMed ID: 19569182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PEP-FOLD: an online resource for de novo peptide structure prediction.
Maupetit J; Derreumaux P; Tuffery P
Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jul; 37(Web Server issue):W498-503. PubMed ID: 19433514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accurate prediction for atomic-level protein design and its application in diversifying the near-optimal sequence space.
Fromer M; Yanover C
Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):682-705. PubMed ID: 19003998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins.
Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Mol Biol; 1994 Jan; 235(3):983-1002. PubMed ID: 8289329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ab initio prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a de novo designed protein: a double-blind case study.
Klepeis JL; Wei Y; Hecht MH; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):560-70. PubMed ID: 15609306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A hidden markov model derived structural alphabet for proteins.
Camproux AC; Gautier R; Tufféry P
J Mol Biol; 2004 Jun; 339(3):591-605. PubMed ID: 15147844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protein structure estimation from minimal restraints using Rosetta.
Rohl CA
Methods Enzymol; 2005; 394():244-60. PubMed ID: 15808223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular dynamics simulations of peptides and proteins with a continuum electrostatic model based on screened Coulomb potentials.
Hassan SA; Mehler EL; Zhang D; Weinstein H
Proteins; 2003 Apr; 51(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 12596268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding.
Fujitsuka Y; Takada S; Luthey-Schulten ZA; Wolynes PG
Proteins; 2004 Jan; 54(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 14705026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility.
Schueler-Furman O; Wang C; Baker D
Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15981249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
Liu Z; Dominy BN; Shakhnovich EI
J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved PEP-FOLD Approach for Peptide and Miniprotein Structure Prediction.
Shen Y; Maupetit J; Derreumaux P; Tufféry P
J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Oct; 10(10):4745-58. PubMed ID: 26588162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced protein fold recognition using a structural alphabet.
Deschavanne P; Tufféry P
Proteins; 2009 Jul; 76(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 19089985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Native and modeled disulfide bonds in proteins: knowledge-based approaches toward structure prediction of disulfide-rich polypeptides.
Thangudu RR; Vinayagam A; Pugalenthi G; Manonmani A; Offmann B; Sowdhamini R
Proteins; 2005 Mar; 58(4):866-79. PubMed ID: 15645448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conformational landscape of the HIV-V3 hairpin loop from all-atom free-energy simulations.
Verma A; Wenzel W
J Chem Phys; 2008 Mar; 128(10):105103. PubMed ID: 18345927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A coarse-grained Langevin molecular dynamics approach to de novo protein structure prediction.
Sasaki TN; Cetin H; Sasai M
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2008 May; 369(2):500-6. PubMed ID: 18294960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining local-structure, fold-recognition, and new fold methods for protein structure prediction.
Karplus K; Karchin R; Draper J; Casper J; Mandel-Gutfreund Y; Diekhans M; Hughey R
Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():491-6. PubMed ID: 14579338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CABS-NMR--De novo tool for rapid global fold determination from chemical shifts, residual dipolar couplings and sparse methyl-methyl NOEs.
Latek D; Kolinski A
J Comput Chem; 2011 Feb; 32(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 20806263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein folds.
Zhang Y; Skolnick J
J Comput Chem; 2004 Apr; 25(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 15011258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
