These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19569187)

  • 1. Good modeling practice for PAT applications: propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Lantz AE
    Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(4):1043-53. PubMed ID: 19569187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matrix notation for efficient development of first-principles models within PAT applications: integrated modeling of antibiotic production with Streptomyces coelicolor.
    Sin G; Odman P; Petersen N; Lantz AE; Gernaey KV
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2008 Sep; 101(1):153-71. PubMed ID: 18454503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of control strategies using the benchmark simulation model No1 (BSM1).
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodriguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):491-9. PubMed ID: 19214003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Introducing uncertainty analysis of nucleation and crystal growth models in Process Analytical Technology (PAT) system design of crystallization processes.
    Samad NA; Sin G; Gernaey KV; Gani R
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2013 Nov; 85(3 Pt B):911-29. PubMed ID: 23770430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In situ near infrared spectroscopy for analyte-specific monitoring of glucose and ammonium in streptomyces coelicolor fermentations.
    Petersen N; Odman P; Padrell AE; Stocks S; Lantz AE; Gernaey KV
    Biotechnol Prog; 2010; 26(1):263-71. PubMed ID: 19899067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Global sensitivity analysis in wastewater treatment plant model applications: prioritizing sources of uncertainty.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):639-51. PubMed ID: 20828785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parameter uncertainty analysis of the non-point source pollution in the Daning River watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China.
    Shen Z; Hong Q; Yu H; Liu R
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):195-205. PubMed ID: 18639918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multimedia environmental model of chemical distribution: fate, transport, and uncertainty analysis.
    Luo Y; Yang X
    Chemosphere; 2007 Jan; 66(8):1396-407. PubMed ID: 17095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sources of uncertainty in model predictions: lessons learned from the IAEA Forest and Fruit Working Group model intercomparisons.
    Linkov I; Burmistrov D
    J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 15978707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design.
    Sin G; Gernaey KV; Neumann MB; van Loosdrecht MC; Gujer W
    Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(11):2894-906. PubMed ID: 19447462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphologically structured model for antitumoral retamycin production during batch and fed-batch cultivations of Streptomyces olindensis.
    Giudici R; Pamboukian CR; Facciotti MC
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2004 May; 86(4):414-24. PubMed ID: 15112294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global sensitivity analysis techniques for probabilistic ground water modeling.
    Mishra S; Deeds N; Ruskauff G
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):730-47. PubMed ID: 19664051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of uncertainty about population parameters on pharmacodynamics-based prediction of clinical trial power.
    Kraiczi H; Frisén M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):118-30. PubMed ID: 15837435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling of branching ratio uncertainty in chemical networks by Dirichlet distributions.
    Carrasco N; Pernot P
    J Phys Chem A; 2007 May; 111(18):3507-12. PubMed ID: 17439103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of modeling and simulation tools for the evaluation of biocatalytic processes: a future perspective.
    Sin G; Woodley JM; Gernaey KV
    Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(6):1529-38. PubMed ID: 19768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-criteria evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control strategies under uncertainty.
    Flores-Alsina X; Rodríguez-Roda I; Sin G; Gernaey KV
    Water Res; 2008 Nov; 42(17):4485-97. PubMed ID: 18804255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A robust method for the joint estimation of yield coefficients and kinetic parameters in bioprocess models.
    Vastemans V; Rooman M; Bogaerts P
    Biotechnol Prog; 2009; 25(3):606-18. PubMed ID: 19455623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling of the pyruvate production with Escherichia coli: comparison of mechanistic and neural networks-based models.
    Zelić B; Bolf N; Vasić-Racki D
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2006 Jun; 29(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 16528533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Uncertainty analysis of penicillin V production using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Biwer A; Griffith S; Cooney C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Apr; 90(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 15742389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment.
    Karanki DR; Kushwaha HS; Verma AK; Ajit S
    Risk Anal; 2009 May; 29(5):662-75. PubMed ID: 19302279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.