206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19569321)
1. Near-term implications of a ban on new coal-fired power plants in the United States.
Newcomer A; Apt J
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(11):3995-4001. PubMed ID: 19569321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coal ban could heat up electricity prices.
Pelley J
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jul; 43(13):4618. PubMed ID: 19673241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Clark VR; Herzog HJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emissions and Cost Implications of Controlled Electric Vehicle Charging in the U.S. PJM Interconnection.
Weis A; Michalek JJ; Jaramillo P; Lueken R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5813-9. PubMed ID: 25830471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
Sioshansi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short run effects of a price on carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. electric generators.
Newcomer A; Blumsack SA; Apt J; Lave LB; Morgan MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(9):3139-44. PubMed ID: 18522086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunities for Decarbonizing Existing U.S. Coal-Fired Power Plants via CO2 Capture, Utilization and Storage.
Zhai H; Ou Y; Rubin ES
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):7571-9. PubMed ID: 26023722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health benefits and control costs of tightening particulate matter emissions standards for coal power plants - The case of Northeast Brazil.
Howard DB; Thé J; Soria R; Fann N; Schaeffer R; Saphores JM
Environ Int; 2019 Mar; 124():420-430. PubMed ID: 30682597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030.
Tong D; Zhang Q; Liu F; Geng G; Zheng Y; Xue T; Hong C; Wu R; Qin Y; Zhao H; Yan L; He K
Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Nov; 52(21):12905-12914. PubMed ID: 30249091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Residential Solar PV Systems in the Carolinas: Opportunities and Outcomes.
Alqahtani BJ; Holt KM; Patiño-Echeverri D; Pratson L
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(4):2082-91. PubMed ID: 26745347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impacts of electricity dispatch protocols on the emission reductions due to wind power and carbon tax.
Yu Y; Rajagopal R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 25607824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration.
Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cleaning up while Changing Gears: The Role of Battery Design, Fossil Fuel Power Plants, and Vehicle Policy for Reducing Emissions in the Transition to Electric Vehicles.
Bruchon M; Chen ZL; Michalek J
Environ Sci Technol; 2024 Feb; 58(8):3787-3799. PubMed ID: 38350416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
