These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19570067)

  • 1. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
    Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
    Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of a patient consultation questionnaire-based scoring system for stratification of outpatient risk of colorectal cancer.
    Rai S; Ballal M; Thomas WM; Miller AS; Jameson JS; Steward WP
    Br J Surg; 2008 Mar; 95(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17932877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitfalls in the construction of cancer guidelines demonstrated by the analyses of colorectal referrals.
    Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2005 Nov; 87(6):419-26. PubMed ID: 16263008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer--do they work?
    Eccersley AJ; Wilson EM; Makris A; Novell JR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Mar; 85(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 12648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The diagnostic performance of scoring systems to identify symptomatic colorectal cancer compared to current referral guidance.
    Marshall T; Lancashire R; Sharp D; Peters TJ; Cheng KK; Hamilton W
    Gut; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1242-8. PubMed ID: 21357592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prioritization of colorectal referrals: a review of the 2-week wait referral system.
    Rai S; Kelly MJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Mar; 9(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 17298615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.
    Chan TH; Goh KL
    Chin J Dig Dis; 2006; 7(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 16412034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variations in the evaluation of colorectal cancer risk.
    Hodder RJ; Ballal M; Selvachandran SN; Cade D
    Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 15859964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
    Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
    Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.
    John SK; Jones OM; Horseman N; Thomas P; Howell RD; Fozard JB
    Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):731-5. PubMed ID: 17854292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The U.K. skin cancer 'two-week rule' proforma: assessment of potential modifications to improve referral accuracy.
    Cox NH; Madan V; Sanders T
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 158(6):1293-8. PubMed ID: 18363747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
    Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the lower gastrointestinal electronic referral protocol.
    John SK; George S; Howell RD; Primrose JN; Fozard JB
    Br J Surg; 2008 Apr; 95(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 18196552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study.
    Selvachandran SN; Hodder RJ; Ballal MS; Jones P; Cade D
    Lancet; 2002 Jul; 360(9329):278-83. PubMed ID: 12147370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Danish national strategy for selective use of colonoscopy in symptomatic outpatients without known risk factors for colorectal cancer.
    Bjerregaard NC; Tøttrup A; Sørensen HT; Laurberg S
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 17327943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An urgent referral strategy for symptomatic patients with suspected colorectal cancer based on a quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test.
    Rodríguez-Alonso L; Rodríguez-Moranta F; Ruiz-Cerulla A; Lobatón T; Arajol C; Binefa G; Moreno V; Guardiola J
    Dig Liver Dis; 2015 Sep; 47(9):797-804. PubMed ID: 26055489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gastroenterologists utilize the referral for EGD to enhance colon cancer screening more effectively than primary care physicians.
    Menees SB; Scheiman J; Carlos R; Mulder A; Fendrick AM
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Apr; 23(7):953-62. PubMed ID: 16573798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients: comparison with NICE and SIGN referral criteria.
    Cubiella J; Salve M; Díaz-Ondina M; Vega P; Alves MT; Iglesias F; Sánchez E; Macía P; Blanco I; Bujanda L; Fernández-Seara J
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):O273-82. PubMed ID: 24456168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delay of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer--a population-based Danish study.
    Korsgaard M; Pedersen L; Laurberg S
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2008; 32(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18406067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective study to assess the value of MMP-9 in improving the appropriateness of urgent referrals for colorectal cancer.
    Ryan AV; Wilson S; Wakelam MJ; Warmington SA; Dunn JA; Hobbs RF; Martin A; Ismail T
    BMC Cancer; 2006 Oct; 6():251. PubMed ID: 17059590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.