These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19570802)

  • 1. Robustness considerations in selecting efficient two-color microarray designs.
    Latif AH; Bretz F; Brunner E
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2355-61. PubMed ID: 19570802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental design for three-color and four-color gene expression microarrays.
    Woo Y; Krueger W; Kaur A; Churchill G
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i459-67. PubMed ID: 15961491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficient two-sample designs for microarray experiments with biological replications.
    Landgrebe J; Bretz F; Brunner E
    In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 15506995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factorial and time course designs for cDNA microarray experiments.
    Glonek GF; Solomon PJ
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):89-111. PubMed ID: 14744830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing statistical precision, power, and robustness of alternative experimental designs for two color microarray platforms based on mixed effects models.
    Tempelman RJ
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2005 May; 105(3-4):175-86. PubMed ID: 15808299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selecting a minimal number of relevant genes from microarray data to design accurate tissue classifiers.
    Huang HL; Lee CC; Ho SY
    Biosystems; 2007; 90(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17291683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance comparison of one-color and two-color platforms within the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project.
    Patterson TA; Lobenhofer EK; Fulmer-Smentek SB; Collins PJ; Chu TM; Bao W; Fang H; Kawasaki ES; Hager J; Tikhonova IR; Walker SJ; Zhang L; Hurban P; de Longueville F; Fuscoe JC; Tong W; Shi L; Wolfinger RD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1140-50. PubMed ID: 16964228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of missing value imputation on detection of differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
    Scheel I; Aldrin M; Glad IK; Sørum R; Lyng H; Frigessi A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4272-9. PubMed ID: 16216830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The efficiency of pooling mRNA in microarray experiments.
    Kendziorski CM; Zhang Y; Lan H; Attie AD
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 12925512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large scale real-time PCR validation on gene expression measurements from two commercial long-oligonucleotide microarrays.
    Wang Y; Barbacioru C; Hyland F; Xiao W; Hunkapiller KL; Blake J; Chan F; Gonzalez C; Zhang L; Samaha RR
    BMC Genomics; 2006 Mar; 7():59. PubMed ID: 16551369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of experimental designs for two-color cDNA microarrays.
    Yang CW; Hsiao CF; Chou CK
    J Comput Biol; 2005 Nov; 12(9):1202-20. PubMed ID: 16305329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and evaluation of Actichip, a thematic microarray for the study of the actin cytoskeleton.
    Muller J; Mehlen A; Vetter G; Yatskou M; Muller A; Chalmel F; Poch O; Friederich E; Vallar L
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Aug; 8():294. PubMed ID: 17727702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Best practices for hybridization design in two-colour microarray analysis.
    Knapen D; Vergauwen L; Laukens K; Blust R
    Trends Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 27(7):406-14. PubMed ID: 19481825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A meta-data based method for DNA microarray imputation.
    Jörnsten R; Ouyang M; Wang HY
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():109. PubMed ID: 17394658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-platform comparison and visualisation of gene expression data using co-inertia analysis.
    Culhane AC; Perrière G; Higgins DG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 4():59. PubMed ID: 14633289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
    Chen JJ; Wang SJ; Tsai CA; Lin CJ
    Pharmacogenomics J; 2007 Jun; 7(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 16940966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Leveraging two-way probe-level block design for identifying differential gene expression with high-density oligonucleotide arrays.
    Barrera L; Benner C; Tao YC; Winzeler E; Zhou Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 5():42. PubMed ID: 15099405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microarray RNA transcriptional profiling: part II. Analytical considerations and annotation.
    Ahmed FE
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2006 Sep; 6(5):703-15. PubMed ID: 17009905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generation of p53 target database via integration of microarray and global p53 DNA-binding site analysis.
    Liu S; Mirza A; Wang L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2004; 281():33-54. PubMed ID: 15220520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.