These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1957222)
41. Linking nursing workload and performance indicators in ambulatory care. Griffin KF; Swan BA Nurs Econ; 2006; 24(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 16583604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A pediatrician's opinion. Lander R Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 56(4):995-6. PubMed ID: 19660641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal. Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The black box. Alumbaugh KA J Ky Med Assoc; 2008 Nov; 106(11):533-4. PubMed ID: 19058479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Significance and measures to control the nursing quality index]. Din JC; Hou YC; Zhang ZX Zhonghua Hu Li Za Zhi; 1995 May; 30(5):283-5. PubMed ID: 8631070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Quality in nursing: three major components. Webb D Dimens Health Serv; 1984 Aug; 61(8):14, 19. PubMed ID: 6479477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Documentation evaluation system: streamlining quality of care and personnel evaluations. Nadzam DM Nurs Manage; 1987 Nov; 18(11):38-42. PubMed ID: 3684085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Quality of care in family planning clinical services in Latin America]. Diaz J; Halbe H Profamilia; 1990 Dec; 6(16):16-30. PubMed ID: 12283631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Evaluation of professionals: competence-productivity. Who evaluates whom? Who evaluates what?]. Nurs Que; 1983; 4(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 6559292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Rx for medical control. Latessa EM JEMS; 1984 Apr; 9(4):39-41. PubMed ID: 10265868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Redesigning performance evaluation and compensation systems to support total quality. O'Rourke LM Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993 Apr; 5(3):2-13. PubMed ID: 10125557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Application of group process model to performance appraisal development in a CQI environment. LaPenta C; Jacobs GM Health Care Manage Rev; 1996; 21(4):45-60. PubMed ID: 8922964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. QA/QI and nursing competence: a combined model. Western P Nurs Manage; 1994 Mar; 25(3):44-6. PubMed ID: 8134040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Call bell requests, call bell response time, and patient satisfaction. Roszell S; Jones CB; Lynn MR J Nurs Care Qual; 2009; 24(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 19092482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Rapid cycle improvement: controlling change. Brown P; Hare D J Ark Med Soc; 2003 Apr; 99(10):320-1. PubMed ID: 12868134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Quality and the appraisal process. Gourlay R Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2000; 13(6-7):288-9. PubMed ID: 11484646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Development and use of a method of assessing patient perception of care. Taylor PW; Nelson-Wernick E; Currey HS; Woodbury ME; Conley LE Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1981; 26(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 10251438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Evaluation or smear campaign]. Ladefoged A Sygeplejersken; 1990 Dec; 90(49):18. PubMed ID: 2089696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool. Fosbinder D; Vos H J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]