These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19572258)

  • 1. Testing treatment effects in unconfounded studies under model misspecification: logistic regression, discretization, and their combination.
    Cangul MZ; Chretien YR; Gutman R; Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2531-51. PubMed ID: 19572258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of risks by predicting counterfactuals.
    Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3761-81. PubMed ID: 19856279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies with dichotomous outcomes.
    Gutman R; Rubin DB
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1795-814. PubMed ID: 23019093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of propensity scores using generalized additive models.
    Woo MJ; Reiter JP; Karr AF
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3805-16. PubMed ID: 18366144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Covariate-adjusted response-adaptive designs for binary response.
    Rosenberger WF; Vidyashankar AN; Agarwal DK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001 Nov; 11(4):227-36. PubMed ID: 12018777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methods of covariate selection: directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure.
    Weng HY; Hsueh YH; Messam LL; Hertz-Picciotto I
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 May; 169(10):1182-90. PubMed ID: 19363102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simple approach to power and sample size calculations in logistic regression and Cox regression models.
    Vaeth M; Skovlund E
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15160408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Logistic quantile regression for bounded outcomes.
    Bottai M; Cai B; McKeown RE
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 19941281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of covariance in parallel-group clinical trials with pretreatment baselines.
    Crager MR
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):895-901. PubMed ID: 3427174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Note in statistical treatment of medical and pharmaceutical data.
    Kawase M; Konishi H; Yagi K; Nishikiori R; Takagi T
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2005 Jul; 100(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 16233861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When does it pay to break the matches for analysis of a matched-pairs design?
    Lynn HS; McCulloch CE
    Biometrics; 1992 Jun; 48(2):397-409. PubMed ID: 1637969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical inference for clinical trials with binary responses when there is a shift in patient population.
    Yang LY; Chi Y; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):437-52. PubMed ID: 21442518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Properties of R(2) statistics for logistic regression.
    Hu B; Palta M; Shao J
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1383-95. PubMed ID: 16059870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression.
    Martens EP; Pestman WR; de Boer A; Belitser SV; Klungel OH
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1142-7. PubMed ID: 18453634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian versus frequentist hypotheses testing in clinical trials with dichotomous and countable outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):985-97. PubMed ID: 20721786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the application of linear relative risk regression models.
    Prentice RL; Mason MW
    Biometrics; 1986 Mar; 42(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 3719048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.
    DerSimonian R; Kacker R
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 16807131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.