145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19572830)
1. Model selection based on FDR-thresholding optimizing the area under the ROC-curve.
Graf AC; Bauer P
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article31. PubMed ID: 19572830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale identification of differentially expressed genes.
Tan YD
Genomics; 2011 Nov; 98(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 21741470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Small-sample precision of ROC-related estimates.
Hanczar B; Hua J; Sima C; Weinstein J; Bittner M; Dougherty ER
Bioinformatics; 2010 Mar; 26(6):822-30. PubMed ID: 20130029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies.
Pawitan Y; Murthy KR; Michiels S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3865-72. PubMed ID: 16105901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of false discovery proportion under general dependence.
Pawitan Y; Calza S; Ploner A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3025-31. PubMed ID: 17046978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a statistical equivalence test applied to microarray data.
Qiu J; Cui X
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):240-66. PubMed ID: 20309757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced signal detection in neuroimaging by means of regional control of the global false discovery rate.
Langers DR; Jansen JF; Backes WH
Neuroimage; 2007 Oct; 38(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17825583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance analysis of ROC indices for comparing diagnostic markers: applications to gene microarray data.
Tsai CA; Chen JJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2004 Nov; 14(4):985-1003. PubMed ID: 15587976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
Liu P; Hwang JT
Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
Lu X; Perkins DL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
