790 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19573312)
21. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Pellegrino A; Villa A; Fruscio R; Signorelli M; Meroni MG; Iedà N; Vitobello D
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2008 Oct; 18(5):474-8. PubMed ID: 18936669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: extraperitoneal versus laparoscopic approach.
Larciprete G; Casalino B; Segatore MF; Jarvis S; Catarinella V; Cirese E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Jun; 126(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 16359771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?
Hong JH; Choi JS; Lee JH; Eom JM; Ko JH; Bae JW; Park SH
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 22683586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [LAPAROSCOPIC NERVE-SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN CERVICAL CANCER].
Berlev IV; Ulrikh EA; Korolkova EN; Ibragimov ZN; Kashina NO; Mikhailyuk GI; Khadzhimba AV; Urmancheeva AF
Vopr Onkol; 2015; 61(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 26242151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [The impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the surgery of cervical cancer patients].
Kornovski Y; Ismail E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 23234009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A fertility-preserving option in early cervical carcinoma: laparoscopy-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Chen Y; Xu H; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang D; Liang Z
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Jan; 136(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 17137704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy.
Fujii S; Takakura K; Matsumura N; Higuchi T; Yura S; Mandai M; Baba T; Yoshioka S
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 17905140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical vaginectomy in patients with vaginal carcinoma: surgical technique and operative outcomes.
Li Y; Chen Y; Xu H; Wang D; Wang Y; Liang Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(5):593-7. PubMed ID: 22841659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):195.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22939724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: analysis of 14 cases].
He YL; Zhang LY; Lu JR; Pan SL; Yang J; Chen YY; Zhou YF; Wang XY
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2002 Dec; 22(12):1136-7. PubMed ID: 12480598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Less radical surgery than radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: a pilot study.
Pluta M; Rob L; Charvat M; Chmel R; Halaska M; Skapa P; Robova H
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 19264352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
Tseng CJ; Shen HP; Lin YH; Lee CY; Wei-Cheng Chiu W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 22482969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Evaluation of postoperative bladder function and prognosis after modified nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].
Wenwen W; Bin L; Jing Z; Gongyi Z; Yeduo Y; Hongmei Z; Xiaoguang L; Lingying W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25030730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
