These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19573693)

  • 21. An esthetic technique to fill screw-retained fixed prostheses.
    Taylor RC; Ghoneim AS; McGlumphy EA
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(6):384-5. PubMed ID: 15641458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Limiting the dimension of a screw-access hole with an interim screw-retained prosthesis.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):648-50. PubMed ID: 25858223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cement considerations for implant-supported restorations.
    Sadan A
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000 May; 12(4):356. PubMed ID: 11404859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new approach to indirect bonding.
    Husain A; Ansari T; Mascarenhas R; Shetty S
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Oct; 43(10):652-4. PubMed ID: 20128195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cemented implant restoration: A technique for minimizing adverse biologic consequences.
    Galván G; Kois JC; Chaiyabutr Y; Kois D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 26119018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simplified technique for recording an implant-supported ovate pontic site in the esthetic zone.
    Raigrodski AJ; Schwedhelm ER; Chen YW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 24210731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. One-appointment indirect composite crowns: clinical technique.
    Brosnihan JB
    Dent Today; 2001 Jun; 20(6):72-5. PubMed ID: 11444139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM; Frey GN; Winkler MM; Tate WH; Burgess JO; Powers JM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns.
    Rahme HY; Tehini GE; Adib SM; Ardo AS; Rifai KT
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):25-32. PubMed ID: 18264522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of provisional luting agents on polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
    Jones RH; Cook GS; Moon MG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 8642519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of a vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) indicator material to block out proximal undercuts during fabrication of fixed provisional restorations.
    Barwacz CA; Fakhry A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):132-3. PubMed ID: 22304748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Techniques to minimize excess luting agent in cement-retained implant restorations.
    Dumbrigue HB; Abanomi AA; Cheng LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 11807495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
    Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
    Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of cements in dental lant success, Part I.
    Wadhwani CP; Schwedhelm ER
    Dent Today; 2013 Apr; 32(4):74-8; quiz 78-9. PubMed ID: 23659095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An analysis of the effect of a vent hole on excess cement expressed at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant crowns.
    Patel D; Invest JC; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jan; 18(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 19166549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.