These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19573943)
21. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up. Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quality of reporting of clinical trials of dogs and cats and associations with treatment effects. Sargeant JM; Thompson A; Valcour J; Elgie R; Saint-Onge J; Marcynuk P; Snedeker K J Vet Intern Med; 2010; 24(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19807866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals. Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Who is blinded in randomized clinical trials? A study of 200 trials and a survey of authors. Haahr MT; Hróbjartsson A Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 17060210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. Kane RL; Wang J; Garrard J J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17292017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of herbal medicine interventions. Gagnier JJ; DeMelo J; Boon H; Rochon P; Bombardier C Am J Med; 2006 Sep; 119(9):800.e1-11. PubMed ID: 16945616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: the way forward. Tiruvoipati R; Balasubramanian SP; Atturu G; Peek GJ; Elbourne D J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 16872940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality of trials reported as conference abstracts in China: how well are they reported? Duan Y; Li J; Ai C; Chen Y; Chen P; Zhang M; Hopewell S Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 19845978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology. Mills E; Loke YK; Wu P; Montori VM; Perri D; Moher D; Guyatt G Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 58(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15206994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A standard method for reporting ramdomized medical scientific research; the 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT)]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 May; 142(19):1089-91. PubMed ID: 9623225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility. Dias S; McNamee R; Vail A Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2617-27. PubMed ID: 16793995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Completeness of reporting in randomized controlled trials of 3 vaccines: a review of adherence to the CONSORT checklist. Scott P; Ott F; Egger M; Low N Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1286-94. PubMed ID: 22935870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reporting quality of conference abstracts on randomised controlled trials in gerontology and geriatrics: a cross-sectional investigation. Mann E; Meyer G Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 21843850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials conducted in China on the treatment of cancer pain. Lu L; Zeng J; Chen Y Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2011 Jun; 11(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 21707284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The quality of randomized controlled trial reporting in spine literature. Naunheim MR; Walcott BP; Nahed BV; Simpson AK; Agarwalla PK; Coumans JV Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(16):1326-30. PubMed ID: 21224750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Poor reporting quality of key Randomization and Allocation Concealment details is still prevalent among published RCTs in 2011: a review. Clark L; Schmidt U; Tharmanathan P; Adamson J; Hewitt C; Torgerson D J Eval Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 19(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 23648066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are randomised controlled trials involving adenotonsillectomy well reported? Ifeacho S; Ajayi O; Hannan SA Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jul; 75(7):939-42. PubMed ID: 21596447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reporting guidelines for primary research: Saying what you did. O'Connor A Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):144-9. PubMed ID: 20951448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality reporting of endoscopic diagnostic studies in gastrointestinal journals: where do we stand on the use of the STARD and CONSORT statements? Areia M; Soares M; Dinis-Ribeiro M Endoscopy; 2010 Feb; 42(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 20140830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; Dewey CE; Dohoo IR; Evans RB; Gray JT; Greiner M; Keefe G; Lefebvre SL; Morley PS; Ramirez A; Sischo W; Smith DR; Snedeker K; Sofos J; Ward MP; Wills R; J Vet Intern Med; 2010; 24(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 20002546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]