BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19574115)

  • 1. Men's ratings of physical attractiveness, health, and partner suitability simultaneously versus separately: Does it matter whether within- or between-subjects designs are used?
    Swami V; Hull C
    Body Image; 2009 Sep; 6(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 19574115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating self and partner physical attractiveness.
    Swami V; Furnham A; Georgiades C; Pang L
    Body Image; 2007 Mar; 4(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 18089256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gay male attraction toward muscular men: does mating context matter?
    Varangis E; Lanzieri N; Hildebrandt T; Feldman M
    Body Image; 2012 Mar; 9(2):270-8. PubMed ID: 22342537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of the physical attractiveness of the self, current romantic partners, and former partners.
    Swami V; Allum L
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 21995611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences.
    Lippa RA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Apr; 36(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 17380374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's meta-perceptions of attractiveness and their relations to body image.
    Dijkstra P; Barelds DP
    Body Image; 2011 Jan; 8(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 21056021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference for attractiveness and thinness in a partner: influence of internalization of the thin ideal and shape/weight dissatisfaction in heterosexual women, heterosexual men, lesbians, and gay men.
    Legenbauer T; Vocks S; Schäfer C; Schütt-Strömel S; Hiller W; Wagner C; Vögele C
    Body Image; 2009 Jun; 6(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 19443281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.
    Gobrogge KL; Perkins PS; Baker JH; Balcer KD; Breedlove SM; Klump KL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Oct; 36(5):717-23. PubMed ID: 17674179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An examination of the love-is-blind bias among gay men and lesbians.
    Swami V
    Body Image; 2009 Mar; 6(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 19195943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determinants and consequences of female attractiveness and sexiness: realistic tests with restaurant waitresses.
    Lynn M
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Oct; 38(5):737-45. PubMed ID: 18543091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Positive illusions about one's partner's physical attractiveness.
    Barelds-Dijkstra P; Barelds DP
    Body Image; 2008 Mar; 5(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 18405868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Body image in homosexual persons].
    Łosiak J
    Psychiatr Pol; 2009; 43(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 19694404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Big and beautiful: attractiveness and health ratings of the female body by male "fat admirers".
    Swami V; Furnham A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Apr; 38(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 17680352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical attractiveness, physical effectiveness, and self-concept in late adolescents.
    Lerner RM; Orlos JB; Knapp JR
    Adolescence; 1976; 11(43):313-26. PubMed ID: 998382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of physical attractiveness in romantic partners: modeling biological and social variables.
    Jonason PK
    J Soc Psychol; 2009 Apr; 149(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 19425359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental investigation of a psychoeducational strategy designed to reduce men's endorsement of societal ideals of women's attractiveness.
    Yamamiya Y; Thompson JK
    Body Image; 2009 Jan; 6(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 18996068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personality information: does it influence attractiveness ratings of various body sizes?
    Fisak B; Tantleff-Dunn S; Peterson RD
    Body Image; 2007 Jun; 4(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 18089267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What leads to romantic attraction: similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study.
    Luo S; Zhang G
    J Pers; 2009 Aug; 77(4):933-64. PubMed ID: 19558447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective measures of attractiveness and their relation to sexual behavior and sexual attitudes in university students.
    Weeden J; Sabini J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2007 Feb; 36(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 17136591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gazing behavior during mixed-sex interactions: sex and attractiveness effects.
    van Straaten I; Holland RW; Finkenauer C; Hollenstein T; Engels RC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19263209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.