94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19574171)
1. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for gynecologic surgery: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.
Ghanbari Z; Baratali BH; Foroughifar T; Pesikhani MD; Shariat M
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 48(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 19574171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative Study of Postoperative Pain between Maylard Incision and Pfannenstiel Incision in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chaywiriyangkool C; Manusook S; Pongrojpaw D; Somprasit C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S16-22. PubMed ID: 29916668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maylard incision in gynecologic surgery: 4-year experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Manusook S; Suwannarurk K; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S102-7. PubMed ID: 25518301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pfannenstiel versus Maylard incision for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial.
Giacalone PL; Daures JP; Vignal J; Herisson C; Hedon B; Laffargue F
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 May; 99(5 Pt 1):745-50. PubMed ID: 11978282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy: a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies.
Panici PB; Zullo MA; Angioli R; Muzii L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15808385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective analysis of radical hysterectomies done for cervical cancer: is there a role for the Pfannenstiel incision?
Scribner DR; Kamelle SA; Gould N; Tillmanns T; Wilson MA; McMeekin S; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Jun; 81(3):481-4. PubMed ID: 11371142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radical hysterectomy: does the type of incision matter?
Orr JW; Orr PJ; Bolen DD; Holimon JL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):399-405; discussion 405-6. PubMed ID: 7645614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).
Seiler CM; Deckert A; Diener MK; Knaebel HP; Weigand MA; Victor N; Büchler MW
Ann Surg; 2009 Jun; 249(6):913-20. PubMed ID: 19474689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of midline and Pfannenstiel incision for radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma.
Ayhan A; Dursun P; Gultekin M; Yuce K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Apr; 33(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 17441889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and tolerability of oxymorphone immediate release for acute postoperative pain after abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.
Aqua K; Gimbel JS; Singla N; Ma T; Ahdieh H; Kerwin R
Clin Ther; 2007 Jun; 29(6):1000-12. PubMed ID: 17692717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraabdominal local anaesthetics for postoperative pain relief following abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study.
Perniola A; Gupta A; Crafoord K; Darvish B; Magnuson A; Axelsson K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 May; 26(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 19521298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results.
Gimbel H; Zobbe V; Andersen BM; Filtenborg T; Gluud C; Tabor A
BJOG; 2003 Dec; 110(12):1088-98. PubMed ID: 14664880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of the Maylard transverse incision for ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery.
Fanning J; Pruett A; Flora RF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):352-5. PubMed ID: 17478369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing versus conventional clamping and suturing for total abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized trial.
Lakeman M; Kruitwagen RF; Vos MC; Roovers JP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 18619923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.
Kearns SR; Connolly EM; McNally S; McNamara DA; Deasy J
Br J Surg; 2001 Jan; 88(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 11136307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysterectomy for large symptomatic myomas: minilaparotomy versus midline vertical incision.
Küçüközkan T; Özkaya E; Uçar FÖ; Kara OF
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):421-5. PubMed ID: 20878173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Obesity and retropubic surgery for stress incontinence: is there really an increased risk of intraoperative complications?
Rogers RG; Lebküchner U; Kammerer-Doak DN; Thompson PK; Walters MD; Nygaard IE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 195(6):1794-8. PubMed ID: 17014816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification compared with manual small-incision cataract surgery by a randomized controlled clinical trial: six-week results.
Gogate PM; Kulkarni SR; Krishnaiah S; Deshpande RD; Joshi SA; Palimkar A; Deshpande MD
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):869-74. PubMed ID: 15878068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial.
Kluivers KB; Hendriks JC; Mol BW; Bongers MY; Bremer GL; de Vet HC; Vierhout ME; Brolmann HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 17368247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Is vaginal hysterectomy important for large uterus of more than 500 g? Comparison with laparotomy].
Switala I; Cosson M; Lanvin D; Querleu D; Crepin G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Oct; 27(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 9854221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
