These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19574602)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness research: Relevance and applications to pharmacy.
    Schumock GT; Pickard AS
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jul; 66(14):1278-86. PubMed ID: 19574602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Pharmacy and Therapeutic (P&T) Committee member knowledge, attitudes and ability regarding the use of comparative effectiveness research (CER) in health care decision-making.
    Tang DH; Warholak TL; Hines LE; Hurwitz J; Brown M; Taylor AM; Brixner D; Malone DC
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(5):768-80. PubMed ID: 24480384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.
    Shah BR; Drozda J; Peterson ED
    Am Heart J; 2010 Jul; 160(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 20598966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ability and Use of Comparative Effectiveness Research by P&T Committee Members and Support Staff: A 1-Year Follow-up.
    Augustine J; Warholak TL; Hines LE; Sun D; Brown M; Hurwitz J; Taylor AM; Brixner D; Cobaugh DJ; Schlaifer M; Malone DC
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2016 Jun; 22(6):618-25. PubMed ID: 27231790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews of pharmacy practice research: methodologic issues in searching, evaluating, interpreting, and disseminating results.
    Charrois TL; Durec T; Tsuyuki RT
    Ann Pharmacother; 2009 Jan; 43(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 19050169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative effectiveness research in practice and policy for radiation oncology.
    Lawrence WF
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 24314343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
    Witt CM
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
    Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Armstrong K
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):E23-54. PubMed ID: 20119474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The case for a comparative, value-based alternative to the patient-centered outcomes research model for comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E8. PubMed ID: 22746240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An introduction to comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Neurosurgery; 2012 Feb; 70(2):425-34; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 21849923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of comparative effectiveness research in Asia, Europe, and North America.
    Patel I; Rarus R; Tan X; Lee EK; Guy J; Ahmad A; Chang J
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2015; 47(6):585-93. PubMed ID: 26729947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine? Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap?].
    Witt CM; Huang WJ; Lao L; Berman BM
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 33(8):1030-5. PubMed ID: 24325048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.