191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19574924)
1. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography according to a polyp size threshold for polypectomy.
Heresbach D; Chauvin P; Hess-Migliorretti A; Riou F; Grolier J; Josselin JM
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2010 Jun; 22(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19574924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT colonography to screen for colorectal cancer and aortic aneurysm in the Medicare population: cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 May; 192(5):1332-40. PubMed ID: 19380558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small and diminutive polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a decision analysis for referral to colonoscopy.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 18094303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening with computed tomography colonography: the impact of not reporting diminutive lesions.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Morini S
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(11):2213-21. PubMed ID: 17455218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical management of small (6- to 9-mm) polyps detected at screening CT colonography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Pickhardt PJ; Hassan C; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1509-16. PubMed ID: 18941093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?
Kriza C; Emmert M; Wahlster P; Niederländer C; Kolominsky-Rabas P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e629-36. PubMed ID: 23938237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Kim DH; Zullo A; Iafrate F; Di Giulio L; Morini S
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Apr; 168(7):696-705. PubMed ID: 18413551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.
Hassan C; Zullo A; Laghi A; Reitano I; Taggi F; Cerro P; Iafrate F; Giustini M; Winn S; Morini S
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 17112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer.
Kuntz KM; Popp J; Beck JR; Zauber AG; Weinberg DS
BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2020 Sep; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 32933928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis.
Palimaka S; Blackhouse G; Goeree R
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(15):1-43. PubMed ID: 26366240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of CT colonography for UK NHS colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults aged 60-69 years.
Lee D; Muston D; Sweet A; Cunningham C; Slater A; Lock K
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(3):141-54. PubMed ID: 20369905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Greuter MJ; Berkhof J; Fijneman RJ; Demirel E; Lew JB; Meijer GA; Stoker J; Coupé VM
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 89(1063):20150910. PubMed ID: 27194458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal.
Pooler BD; Kim DH; Matkowskyj KA; Newton MA; Halberg RB; Grady WM; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ
Gut; 2023 Nov; 72(12):2321-2328. PubMed ID: 37507217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings.
Rex DK; Overhiser AJ; Chen SC; Cummings OW; Ulbright TM
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jan; 104(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 19098863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Leung WK; Winter TC; Hinshaw JL; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Hsu RH; Pfau PR
N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(14):1403-12. PubMed ID: 17914041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing CT colonography and flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomised trial within a population-based screening programme.
Regge D; Iussich G; Segnan N; Correale L; Hassan C; Arrigoni A; Asnaghi R; Bestagini P; Bulighin G; Cassinis MC; Ederle A; Ferraris A; Galatola G; Gallo T; Gandini G; Garretti L; Martina MC; Molinar D; Montemezzi S; Morra L; Motton M; Occhipinti P; Pinali L; Soardi GA; Senore C
Gut; 2017 Aug; 66(8):1434-1440. PubMed ID: 27196588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomographic colonography for colorectal screening.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Hoff G; Kay CL
Endoscopy; 2007 Jun; 39(6):545-9. PubMed ID: 17554653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
