372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19575053)
1. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison in vivo of the first tapered and nontapered instruments that bind at the apical constriction.
Kfir A; Rosenberg E; Fuss Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Sep; 102(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 16920549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
Herrera M; Abalos C; Planas AJ; Llamas R
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):995-8. PubMed ID: 17878091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial apical fit of K-files versus LightSpeed LSX instruments assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Marending M; Schicht OO; Paqué F
Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 21992481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vivo comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators.
Welk AR; Baumgartner JC; Marshall JG
J Endod; 2003 Aug; 29(8):497-500. PubMed ID: 12929694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of apex locator and endodontic motor for continuous length control during root canal treatment.
Altenburger MJ; Cenik Y; Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 19220512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detecting the apical constriction in curved mandibular molar roots--preflared versus nonflared canals.
Khan IU; Sobhi MB
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2003; 15(3):47-9. PubMed ID: 14727341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of maintaining apical patency on canal transportation.
Tsesis I; Amdor B; Tamse A; Kfir A
Int Endod J; 2008 May; 41(5):431-5. PubMed ID: 18312378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.
Venturi M; Breschi L
Int Endod J; 2007 May; 40(5):362-73. PubMed ID: 17309741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended apical enlargement with hand files versus rotary NiTi files. Part II.
Bartha T; Kalwitzki M; Löst C; Weiger R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Nov; 102(5):692-7. PubMed ID: 17052649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.
Uzun O; Topuz O; Tinaz C; Nekoofar MH; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):725-32. PubMed ID: 18637852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria.
Card SJ; Sigurdsson A; Orstavik D; Trope M
J Endod; 2002 Nov; 28(11):779-83. PubMed ID: 12470024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical diameter of apical foramen and of file size using the Root ZX apex locator: an in vitro study.
Herrera M; Ábalos C; Lucena C; Jiménez-Planas A; Llamas R
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1306-9. PubMed ID: 21846555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of cervical preflaring of root canal on determination of initial apical file using Gates Glidden drills, Protaper, Race and diamond-coated Galaxy files.
Ashwini TS; Bhandari S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 23151709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Apical fit of initial K-files in maxillary molars assessed by micro-computed tomography.
Paqué F; Zehnder M; Marending M
Int Endod J; 2010 Apr; 43(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 20487453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Siu C; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):962-5. PubMed ID: 19567315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
