154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19575283)
21. Ultrasound Breast Elastographic Evaluation of Mass-Forming Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ with Histological Correlation - New Findings for a Toothpaste Sign.
Leong LC; Sim LS; Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(5):2673-8. PubMed ID: 27268649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multifocal, multicentric, and contralateral breast cancers: bilateral whole-breast US in the preoperative evaluation of patients.
Moon WK; Noh DY; Im JG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):569-76. PubMed ID: 12147858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected on Mammography versus Ultrasound Only in Asymptomatic Patients.
Moon HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Yoon JH; Park VY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 30322671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictors of invasive disease in patients preoperatively diagnosed with ductal carcinoma without stromal invasion, with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US).
Maeda H; Hayashida T; Watanuki R; Kikuchi M; Nakashoji A; Yokoe T; Seki T; Takahashi M; Kitagawa Y
Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 33200381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Radiologic-histopathologic correlation of microcalcifications from 11g vacuum biopsy: analysis of 3196 core biopsies].
Fischmann A; Pietsch-Breitfeld B; Müller-Schimpfle M; Siegmann K; Wersebe A; Rothenberger-Janzen K; Claussen CD; Janzen J
Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):538-43. PubMed ID: 15088178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Downey P; Gill PG; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105(11):1669-75. PubMed ID: 22052156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Staging of breast cancer with ultrasound.
Yang WT
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 21782123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast Nonmass Enhancement Detected with MRI: Uility and Lesion Characterization with Second-Look Ultrasonography.
Hsu HH; Chang TH; Chou YC; Peng YJ; Ko KH; Chang WC; Lin YP; Hsu GC; Yu JC
Breast J; 2015; 21(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 26390913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A multicentered, randomized, controlled trial comparing radioguided seed localization to standard wire localization for nonpalpable, invasive and in situ breast carcinomas.
Lovrics PJ; Goldsmith CH; Hodgson N; McCready D; Gohla G; Boylan C; Cornacchi S; Reedijk M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3407-14. PubMed ID: 21533657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Impact of breast ultrasound screening in gynecological practice].
Madjar H; Becker S; Doubek K; Horchler T; Mendoza M; Moisidis-Tesch C; Näther B; Niebling K; Pröls U; Schardt AR; Ulrich S; Zahn U
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Jun; 31(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 20408119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic ultrasonography and mammography for invasive and noninvasive breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years.
Osako T; Takahashi K; Iwase T; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Tada K; Makita M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F
Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 17485910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasonography of malignant breast neoplasms. Analysis of carcinomas missed as tumor.
Skaane P; Sauer T
Acta Radiol; 1999 Jul; 40(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 10394864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ultrasonography- and/or mammography-guided breast conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: experience with 87 lesions.
Hayashi N; Tsunoda H; Abe E; Kikuchi M; Enokido K; Tsugawa K; Suzuki K; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2012 Apr; 19(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 20725871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Re: Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Meng ZY; Hu B; Shen E
Breast Cancer; 2014 Nov; 21(6):774-5. PubMed ID: 25224719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast Density in a Contemporary Cohort of Women With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).
Gooch JC; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Kurz E; Guth A; Lee J; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(11):3472-3477. PubMed ID: 31147991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Small (< or = 2-cm) breast cancer treated with US-guided radiofrequency ablation: feasibility study.
Fornage BD; Sneige N; Ross MI; Mirza AN; Kuerer HM; Edeiken BS; Ames FC; Newman LA; Babiera GV; Singletary SE
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):215-24. PubMed ID: 14990810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
