BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19575327)

  • 21. Retrieval-induced forgetting in a category recognition task.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):286-91. PubMed ID: 19210100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):312-24. PubMed ID: 21928932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the role of item similarity in retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Bäuml KH; Hartinger A
    Memory; 2002 May; 10(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 11958725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Aging and directed forgetting: pre-cue encoding and post-cue rehearsal effects.
    Dulaney CL; Marks W; Link KE
    Exp Aging Res; 2004; 30(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 14660335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The dual effect of context on memory of related and unrelated themes: discrimination at encoding and cue at retrieval.
    Levy-Gigi E; Vakil E
    Memory; 2012; 20(7):728-41. PubMed ID: 22809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.
    Kelley MR; Pentz C; Reysen MB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1977-85. PubMed ID: 24460096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the composition of part-set cues.
    Kroeger ME; Hueng NL; Curry SD; Copeland MB; Kelley MR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2365-2370. PubMed ID: 30836817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 17475195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect.
    Oberauer K; Meyer N
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Memory retrieval in schizophrenia: evidence from part-list cuing.
    Kissler J; Bäuml KH
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2005 May; 11(3):273-80. PubMed ID: 15892903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
    Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.
    Kornell N; Hays MJ; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):989-98. PubMed ID: 19586265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: effects of study-test similarity.
    Hornberger M; Morcom AM; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1196-210. PubMed ID: 15453974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection.
    Herron JE; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 14511537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age differences in cued recall and recognition under varying encoding and retrieval conditions.
    West RL; Boatwright LK
    Exp Aging Res; 1983; 9(3):185-9. PubMed ID: 6641780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.