These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1957570)

  • 1. Comparative flow rates of thin-walled and conventional-walled intravenous catheters.
    Bohn CM
    AANA J; 1991 Oct; 59(5):453-6. PubMed ID: 1957570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro and in vivo rates of fluid flow through catheters in peripheral veins of dogs.
    Fulton RB; Hauptman JG
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1991 May; 198(9):1622-4. PubMed ID: 2061178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pediatric catheter flow rates.
    Hodge D; Fleisher G
    Am J Emerg Med; 1985 Sep; 3(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 4041190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An assessment of the flow rate within peritoneal dialysis catheters, using a standardized in vitro technique.
    Graff J; Joffe P; Ladefoged SD
    Adv Perit Dial; 1992; 8():294-7. PubMed ID: 1361809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pigtail catheters used for percutaneous fluid drainage: comparison of performance characteristics.
    Macha DB; Thomas J; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 2006 Mar; 238(3):1057-63. PubMed ID: 16505398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Central venous catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium.
    Macha DB; Nelson RC; Howle LE; Hollingsworth JW; Schindera ST
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):870-8. PubMed ID: 19789224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in pain perception associated with intravenous catheter insertion.
    Ahrens T; Wiersema L; Weilitz PB
    J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 2005510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in penetration force of intravenous catheters: effect of grinding methods on inner needles of intravenous catheters.
    Suzuki T; Tanaka A; Fukuyama H; Nishiyama J; Kanazawa M; Oda M; Takahashi M
    Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2004 Dec; 29(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 15717489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power injection of microcatheters: an in vitro comparison.
    Brown DB; Papadouris DC; Davis RV; Vedantham S; Pilgram TK
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Jan; 16(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 15640416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of flow rates for standard and large-bore blood tubing.
    Iserson KV; Reeter AK; Criss E
    West J Med; 1985 Aug; 143(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 4036117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two percutaneous intravenous "midline" catheters in cystic fibrosis.
    Lacy DE; Spencer DA; Venkataraman M; Ruiz G; Weller PH
    J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 8708839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injection rate threshold of triple-lumen central venous catheters: an in vitro study.
    Zamos DT; Emch TM; Patton HA; D'Amico FJ; Bansal SK
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 17434071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical and light microscopic comparison of four different small-diameter catheters used for continuous spinal anesthesia.
    Pitkänen M; Tuominen M; Rosenberg P; Wahlström T
    Reg Anesth; 1992; 17(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 1419943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluid mechanics and clinical success of central venous catheters for dialysis--answers to simple but persisting problems.
    Ash SR
    Semin Dial; 2007; 20(3):237-56. PubMed ID: 17555490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are 2 smaller intravenous catheters as good as 1 larger intravenous catheter?
    Li SF; Cole M; Forest R; Chilstrom M; Reinersman E; Jones MP; Zinzuwadia S; King S; Yadav K
    Am J Emerg Med; 2010 Jul; 28(6):724-7. PubMed ID: 20637391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of triple lumen catheters in the critically ill.
    Manglano R; Martin M
    Am Surg; 1991 Jun; 57(6):370-2. PubMed ID: 2048848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exit of catheter lock solutions from double lumen acute haemodialysis catheters--an in vitro study.
    Sungur M; Eryuksel E; Yavas S; Bihorac A; Layon AJ; Caruso L
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Dec; 22(12):3533-7. PubMed ID: 17898024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of midline catheters in low birth weight infants.
    Lesser E; Chhabra R; Brion LP; Suresh BR
    J Perinatol; 1996; 16(3 Pt 1):205-7. PubMed ID: 8817432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: drainage flow and retention strength.
    Canales BK; Hendlin K; Braasch M; Antolak C; Reddy A; Odeh B; Monga M
    Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 16040088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of intravenous catheters for femoral arterial cannulation in infants having complicated sternal re-entry.
    Kogon B; Voss J; Villari C; Shah N; Spitzer K; Moore M; McGoldrick A; Kirshbom P; Kanter K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 134(3):746-9. PubMed ID: 17723828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.