233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19575856)
1. [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brush cytology diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumors].
Gao L; Man XH; Cai YB; Zheng JM; Zhu MH
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 38(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 19575856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biliary tract cytology in specimens obtained by direct cholangiographic procedures: a study of 74 cases.
de Peralta-Venturina MN; Wong DK; Purslow MJ; Kini SR
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Jun; 14(4):334-48. PubMed ID: 8725136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.
Fogel EL; deBellis M; McHenry L; Watkins JL; Chappo J; Cramer H; Schmidt S; Lazzell-Pannell L; Sherman S; Lehman GA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16377319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brush cytology of the biliary tract: retrospective study of 278 cases with histopathologic correlation.
Govil H; Reddy V; Kluskens L; Treaba D; Massarani-Wafai R; Selvaggi S; Gattuso P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 May; 26(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11992366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of stent cytology for the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary neoplasms.
Devereaux BM; Fogel EL; Bucksot L; Shelly LA; Lehman GA; Sherman S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1028-31. PubMed ID: 12809824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monocentric study of bile aspiration associated with biliary brushing performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 239 patients with symptomatic biliary stricture.
Fior-Gozlan M; Giovannini D; Rabeyrin M; Mc Leer-Florin A; Laverrière MH; Bichard P
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 May; 124(5):330-9. PubMed ID: 26700399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples.
Barr Fritcher EG; Voss JS; Brankley SM; Campion MB; Jenkins SM; Keeney ME; Henry MR; Kerr SM; Chaiteerakij R; Pestova EV; Clayton AC; Zhang J; Roberts LR; Gores GJ; Halling KC; Kipp BR
Gastroenterology; 2015 Dec; 149(7):1813-1824.e1. PubMed ID: 26327129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.
Stoos-Veić T; Bilić B; Kaić G; Ostović KT; Babić Z; Kujundzić M
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 20432742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brushings in preoperative assessment of pancreaticobiliary strictures: what's new?
Athanassiadou P; Grapsa D
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 18323272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided brush cytology for diagnosis of patients with malignant obstruction of the bile duct.
Foutch PG; Kerr DM; Harlan JR; Manne RK; Kummet TD; Sanowski RA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):791-5. PubMed ID: 2164768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reclassification of "atypical" diagnoses in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography-guided biliary brushings.
Okonkwo AM; De Frias DV; Gunn R; Diaz L; Schindler S; Lal A; Nayar R
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(3):435-42. PubMed ID: 12789928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic brush cytology from the biliary duct system is still valuable.
Eiholm S; Thielsen P; Kromann-Andersen H
Dan Med J; 2013 Jul; 60(7):A4656. PubMed ID: 23809967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative predictors of malignancy in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
Wiesenauer CA; Schmidt CM; Cummings OW; Yiannoutsos CT; Howard TJ; Wiebke EA; Goulet RJ; McHenry L; Sherman S; Lehman GA; Cramer H; Madura JA
Arch Surg; 2003 Jun; 138(6):610-7; discussion 617-8. PubMed ID: 12799331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.
Mehmood S; Loya A; Yusuf MA
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 27221813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography standard cytology: 10-y review of the literature.
Burnett AS; Calvert TJ; Chokshi RJ
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 23866788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strategies for improving diagnostic accuracy of biliary strictures.
Salomao M; Gonda TA; Margolskee E; Eguia V; Remotti H; Poneros JM; Sethi A; Saqi A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 123(4):244-52. PubMed ID: 25564796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting the yield of brush cytology for the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary cancers.
Parsi MA; Deepinder F; Lopez R; Stevens T; Dodig M; Zuccaro G
Pancreas; 2011 Jan; 40(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 20871478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing.
Yamaguchi T; Shirai Y; Nakamura N; Sudo K; Nakamura K; Hironaka S; Hara T; Denda T
Pancreas; 2012 Nov; 41(8):1225-9. PubMed ID: 23086246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The meaning of equivocal pancreatic cytology in patients thought to have pancreatic cancer.
Enayati PG; Traverso LW; Galagan K; Thirlby RC; Larson J; Hauptman EM; Kozarek RA
Am J Surg; 1996 May; 171(5):525-8. PubMed ID: 8651401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures.
Smoczynski M; Jablonska A; Matyskiel A; Lakomy J; Dubowik M; Marek I; Biernat W; Limon J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 22078103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
