These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19577012)

  • 21. Power approximation for the van Elteren test based on location-scale family of distributions.
    Zhao YD; Qu Y; Rahardja D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(6):803-15. PubMed ID: 17146980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. To permute or not to permute.
    Huang Y; Xu H; Calian V; Hsu JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2244-8. PubMed ID: 16870938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The appropriateness of the Wilcoxon test in ordinal data.
    Hilton JF
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):631-45. PubMed ID: 8731005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses.
    Demissie M; Mascialino B; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2008 May; 24(9):1168-74. PubMed ID: 18344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparisons of two-part models with competitors.
    Lachenbruch PA
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1215-34. PubMed ID: 11304737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Power and sample size computations in simultaneous tests for non-inferiority based on relative margins.
    Dilba G; Bretz F; Hothorn LA; Guiard V
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1131-47. PubMed ID: 16217842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Welch-type test for homogeneity of contrasts under heteroscedasticity with application to meta-analysis.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Knight E; Gao H
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(23):3655-70. PubMed ID: 15534893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microarray data analysis: a hierarchical T-test to handle heteroscedasticity.
    de Menezes RX; Boer JM; van Houwelingen HC
    Appl Bioinformatics; 2004; 3(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15702953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Fransen J; Lemmens WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 60(12):1234-8. PubMed ID: 17998077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Further evaluating the conditional decision rule for comparing two independent means.
    Hayes AF; Cai L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):217-44. PubMed ID: 17971268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of profile-likelihood-based confidence intervals with other rank-based methods for the two-sample problem in ordered categorical data.
    Funatogawa I; Funatogawa T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 May; 33(3):371-385. PubMed ID: 36533908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A nonparametric two-sample comparison for skewed data with unequal variances.
    Neuhäuser M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 63(6):691-3. PubMed ID: 20056388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improved statistics for contrasting means of two samples under non-normality.
    Xu J; Cui X; Gupta AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):21-40. PubMed ID: 17908368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On estimation of the variance in Cochran-Armitage trend tests for genetic association using case-control studies.
    Zheng G; Gastwirth JL
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(18):3150-9. PubMed ID: 16397860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Location tests for biomarker studies: a comparison using simulations for the two-sample case.
    Scheinhardt MO; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2013; 52(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 23877617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sample size and statistical power assessing the effect of interventions in the context of mixture distributions with detection limits.
    Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2647-57. PubMed ID: 16456897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing two independent groups: a test based on a one-step M-estimator and bootstrap-t.
    Özdemir AF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):322-37. PubMed ID: 22708512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.