242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19577156)
1. Quantitative investigation of palatal bone depth and cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement in adults.
Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 19577156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cortical bone thickness and bone depth of the posterior palatal alveolar process for mini-implant insertion in adults.
Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 22133945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.
Ryu JH; Park JH; Vu Thi Thu T; Bayome M; Kim Y; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 22858330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there an ideal insertion angle and position for orthodontic mini-implants in the anterior palate? A CBCT study in humans.
Becker K; Unland J; Wilmes B; Tarraf NE; Drescher D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):345-354. PubMed ID: 31474264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the palatal bone for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in Japanese adults.
Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Tamatsu Y; Kageyama I; Hashimoto M; Ide Y
Cranio; 2012 Jan; 30(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 22435178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft-tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites.
Kim HJ; Yun HS; Park HD; Kim DH; Park YC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 16905061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of infrazygomatic bone depth for mini-screw insertion.
Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):638-42. PubMed ID: 19281501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which region of the median palate is a suitable location of temporary orthodontic anchorage devices? A histomorphometric study on human cadavers aged 15-20 years.
Stockmann P; Schlegel KA; Srour S; Neukam FW; Fenner M; Felszeghy E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 19397643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone quality in the midpalate for temporary anchorage devices.
Wehrbein H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 19126107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three dimensional anatomical exploration of the anterior hard palate at the level of the third ruga for the placement of mini-implants--a cone-beam CT study.
Hourfar J; Kanavakis G; Bister D; Schätzle M; Awad L; Nienkemper M; Goldbecher C; Ludwig B
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 25564503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mini-implant behavior to shear tensile forces in the porcine mandible.
Edwards CW; Mah JK
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 21491003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure?
Kim SH; Kang SM; Choi YS; Kook YA; Chung KR; Huang JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):264-76. PubMed ID: 20816295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement.
Baumgaertel S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):230-5. PubMed ID: 19651353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim SH; Yoon HG; Choi YS; Hwang EH; Kook YA; Nelson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):635-41. PubMed ID: 19409346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
