113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19577232)
1. Proposed guidelines for increasing the reliability and validity of Letournel classification system.
Prevezas N; Antypas G; Louverdis D; Konstas A; Papasotiriou A; Sbonias G
Injury; 2009 Oct; 40(10):1098-103. PubMed ID: 19577232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.
Petrisor BA; Bhandari M; Orr RD; Mandel S; Kwok DC; Schemitsch EH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 12720013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment.
Zhang R; Yin Y; Li A; Wang Z; Hou Z; Zhuang Y; Fan S; Wu Z; Yi C; Lyu G; Ma X; Zhang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 101(22):2015-2025. PubMed ID: 31764364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of an algorithm for classifying acetabular fractures: a role for resident education?
Ly TV; Stover MD; Sims SH; Reilly MC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Aug; 469(8):2371-6. PubMed ID: 21643925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?
Clarke-Jenssen J; Øvre SA; Røise O; Madsen JE
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):913-8. PubMed ID: 25931251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does semi-automatic bone-fragment segmentation improve the reproducibility of the Letournel acetabular fracture classification?
Boudissa M; Orfeuvre B; Chabanas M; Tonetti J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):633-638. PubMed ID: 28428032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The value of specific radiological features in the classification of acetabular fractures.
Patel V; Day A; Dinah F; Kelly M; Bircher M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Jan; 89(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 17259420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?
Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normal acetabular anatomy for acetabular fracture assessment: CT and plain film correlation.
Saks BJ
Radiology; 1986 Apr; 159(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 3952299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing].
Schäffler A; Fensky F; Knöschke D; Haas NP; Becken AG; Stöckle U; König B
Unfallchirurg; 2013 Nov; 116(11):1006-14. PubMed ID: 23949195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.
Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic Evaluation of Acetabular Fractures: Review and Update on Methodology.
Mauffrey C; Stacey S; York PJ; Ziran BH; Archdeacon MT
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Feb; 26(3):83-93. PubMed ID: 29266045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT-generated radiographs in obese patients with acetabular fractures: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?
Sinatra PM; Moed BR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Nov; 472(11):3362-9. PubMed ID: 24867453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures.
O'Toole RV; Cox G; Shanmuganathan K; Castillo RC; Turen CH; Sciadini MF; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 May; 24(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 20418733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures.
Hurson C; Tansey A; O'Donnchadha B; Nicholson P; Rice J; McElwain J
Injury; 2007 Oct; 38(10):1158-62. PubMed ID: 17884058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION.
Yucens M; Aydemir AN; Demirkan AF
Acta Ortop Bras; 2024; 32(1):e267640. PubMed ID: 38532863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-observer reliability and intra-observer reproducibility of the Weber classification of ankle fractures.
Malek IA; Machani B; Mevcha AM; Hyder NH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1204-6. PubMed ID: 16943473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Can the new CT-based classification of acetabular fractures be useful for clinical practice?].
Chmelová J; Dzupa V; Sprindrich J; Báca V; Grill R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 17623611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
