113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19577232)
21. Value of 3-D CT in classifying acetabular fractures during orthopedic residency training.
Garrett J; Halvorson J; Carroll E; Webb LX
Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e615-20. PubMed ID: 22588400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The Relevance of the Judet and Letournel Acetabular Fracture Classification System in the Modern Era: A Review.
Butler BA; Lawton CD; Hashmi SZ; Stover MD
J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Feb; 33 Suppl 2():S3-S7. PubMed ID: 30688852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fractures of the acetabulum: imaging, classification, and understanding.
Potok PS; Hopper KD; Umlauf MJ
Radiographics; 1995 Jan; 15(1):7-23; discussion 23-4. PubMed ID: 7899615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computerized tomography in the evaluation and classification of fractures of the acetabulum.
St Pierre RK; Oliver T; Somoygi J; Whitesides T; Fleming LL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Sep; (188):234-7. PubMed ID: 6467721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acetabular fractures classification of Letournel and Judet--a systematic approach.
Saterbak AM; Marsh JL; Turbett T; Brandser E
Iowa Orthop J; 1995; 15():184-96. PubMed ID: 7634031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [The Judet and Letournel classification of acetabular fractures].
Ucieklak J; Rapała K; Obrebski M
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2000; 65(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 10967836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Campbell DG; Garbuz DS; Masri BA; Duncan CP
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Jan; 16(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 11172275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Diagnosis, classification and surgical indications in acetabulum fractures].
Baumgaertel F
Orthopade; 1992 Nov; 21(6):427-41. PubMed ID: 1475129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models.
Keltz E; Keshet D; Peled E; Zvi Y; Norman D; Keren Y
World J Orthop; 2021 Feb; 12(2):82-93. PubMed ID: 33614427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Classifications in brief: Letournel classification for acetabular fractures.
Alton TB; Gee AO
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 24214824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures.
Rayan F; Dodd M; Haddad FS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Dec; 90(12):1576-9. PubMed ID: 19043127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Acetabular fractures revisited: part 1, redefinition of the Letournel anterior column.
Harris JH; Lee JS; Coupe KJ; Trotscher T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1363-6. PubMed ID: 15149975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Visual Interpretation of Plain Radiographs in Orthopaedics Using Eye-Tracking Technology.
Hanley J; Warren D; Glass N; Tranel D; Karam M; Buckwalter J
Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():225-231. PubMed ID: 28852362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reliability of a classification of fractures of the hand based on the AO comprehensive classification system.
Szwebel JD; Ehlinger V; Pinsolle V; Bruneteau P; Pélissier P; Salmi LR
J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2010 Jun; 35(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20100711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Acetabulum fractures. Diagnosis, classification, evaluation].
Otto W
Zentralbl Chir; 2000; 125(9):725-9. PubMed ID: 11050752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: the significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fractures.
Thomsen NO; Olsen LH; Nielsen ST
J Orthop Sci; 2002; 7(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11956974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interobserver reliability of the young-burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring.
Koo H; Leveridge M; Thompson C; Zdero R; Bhandari M; Kreder HJ; Stephen D; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jul; 22(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 18594301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validity and reliability of the Paprosky acetabular defect classification.
Yu R; Hofstaetter JG; Sullivan T; Costi K; Howie DW; Solomon LB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Jul; 471(7):2259-65. PubMed ID: 23412731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Acetabulum surgery. Development, current status and prospects].
Haas NP; Stöckle UC; Hoffmann R
Zentralbl Chir; 1999; 124(11):999-1003. PubMed ID: 10612205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Computer tomography in the diagnosis and therapy of acetabular fractures].
Senohradski K; Karovic B; Miric D
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001; 129(7-8):194-8. PubMed ID: 11797449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
