These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19579021)

  • 1. Tactile perception of roughness: raised-dot spacing, density and disposition.
    Dépeault A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 197(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 19579021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical determinants of the shape of the psychophysical curve relating tactile roughness to raised-dot spacing: implications for neuronal coding of roughness.
    Sutu A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Mar; 109(5):1403-15. PubMed ID: 23221417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tactile speed scaling: contributions of time and space.
    Dépeault A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):1422-34. PubMed ID: 18199814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch.
    Meftah el-M ; Belingard L; Chapman CE
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jun; 132(3):351-61. PubMed ID: 10883383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple parietal operculum subdivisions in humans: tactile activation maps.
    Burton H; Sinclair RJ; Wingert JR; Dierker DL
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2008 Sep; 25(3):149-62. PubMed ID: 18821280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: further evidence of an opponent process in the sense of touch.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 29706104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Roughness perception in tactile channels: evidence for an opponent process in the sense of touch.
    Gescheider GA; Wright JH
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2013 Sep; 30(3):120-32. PubMed ID: 23952287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differential effects of tactile high- and low-frequency stimulation on tactile discrimination in human subjects.
    Ragert P; Kalisch T; Bliem B; Franzkowiak S; Dinse HR
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 18215277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central neural mechanisms contributing to the perception of tactile roughness.
    Chapman CE; Tremblay F; Jiang W; Belingard L; Meftah el-M
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Sep; 135(1-2):225-33. PubMed ID: 12356453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.
    Connor CE; Hsiao SS; Phillips JR; Johnson KO
    J Neurosci; 1990 Dec; 10(12):3823-36. PubMed ID: 2269886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuronal correlates of tactile speed in primary somatosensory cortex.
    Dépeault A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct; 110(7):1554-66. PubMed ID: 23843433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of Task Instruction on Haptic Texture Processing: The Neural Underpinning of Roughness and Spatial Density Perception.
    Eck J; Kaas AL; Mulders JL; Hausfeld L; Kourtzi Z; Goebel R
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jan; 26(1):384-401. PubMed ID: 25491119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.
    Cascio CJ; Sathian K
    J Neurosci; 2001 Jul; 21(14):5289-96. PubMed ID: 11438604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: a multidimensional analysis.
    Gescheider GA; Bolanowski SJ; Greenfield TC; Brunette KE
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2005 Sep; 22(3):127-40. PubMed ID: 16338822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortical response to mechanical tactile stimuli.
    Hadoush H; Inoue K; Nakanishi K; Kurumadani H; Sunagawa T; Ochi M
    Neuroreport; 2010 Jan; 21(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 19997038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness.
    Smith AM; Chapman CE; Deslandes M; Langlais JS; Thibodeau MP
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):211-23. PubMed ID: 12012159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human Touch Receptors Are Sensitive to Spatial Details on the Scale of Single Fingerprint Ridges.
    Jarocka E; Pruszynski JA; Johansson RS
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(16):3622-3634. PubMed ID: 33722975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Somatosensory coding of roughness: the effect of texture adaptation in direct and indirect touch.
    Hollins M; Lorenz F; Harper D
    J Neurosci; 2006 May; 26(20):5582-8. PubMed ID: 16707809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tactile texture signals in primate primary somatosensory cortex and their relation to subjective roughness intensity.
    Bourgeon S; Dépeault A; Meftah el-M; Chapman CE
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 115(4):1767-85. PubMed ID: 26763776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Static and active tactile perception and touch anisotropy: aging and gender effect.
    Abdouni A; Moreau G; Vargiolu R; Zahouani H
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):14240. PubMed ID: 30250244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.