327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19579604)
1. The clinical usefulness of the ZAP classification for non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), using distal esophageal biopsy.
Kim BJ; Rheez PL; Lee H; Kim JH; Son HJ; Chang DK; Kim YH; Kim JJ; Rhee JC; Kim JH
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(90):385-9. PubMed ID: 19579604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-erosive and erosive gastroesophageal reflux diseases: No difference with regard to reflux pattern and motility abnormalities.
Martínek J; Benes M; Hucl T; Drastich P; Stirand P; Spicák J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(7):794-800. PubMed ID: 18584517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reassessment of the diagnostic value of histology in patients with GERD, using multiple biopsy sites and an appropriate control group.
Zentilin P; Savarino V; Mastracci L; Spaggiari P; Dulbecco P; Ceppa P; Savarino E; Parodi A; Mansi C; Fiocca R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Oct; 100(10):2299-306. PubMed ID: 16181384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of measurement of esophageal acid exposure close to the gastroesophageal junction on diagnostic accuracy and event-symptom correlation: a prospective study using wireless dual pH monitoring.
Bansal A; Wani S; Rastogi A; Rastogi K; Goyal A; Hall S; Singh V; Higbee A; Sharma P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Dec; 104(12):2918-25. PubMed ID: 19755975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of esophageal acid exposure distribution along the esophagus among the different gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) groups.
Dickman R; Bautista JM; Wong WM; Bhatt R; Beeler JN; Malagon I; Risner-Adler S; Lam KF; Fass R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17090277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acid and bile reflux in erosive reflux disease, non-erosive reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus.
Hak NG; Mostafa M; Salah T; El-Hemaly M; Haleem M; Abd El-Raouf A; Hamdy E
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(82-83):442-7. PubMed ID: 18613384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between baseline impedance levels and esophageal mucosal integrity in children with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease.
Borrelli O; Salvatore S; Mancini V; Ribolsi M; Gentile M; Bizzarri B; Cicala M; Lindley KJ; De'angelis GL
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2012 Sep; 24(9):828-e394. PubMed ID: 22680230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dyspepsia and IBS symptoms in patients with NERD, ERD and Barrett's esophagus.
Neumann H; Monkemuller K; Kandulski A; Malfertheiner P
Dig Dis; 2008; 26(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 18463443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinct clinical characteristics between patients with nonerosive reflux disease and those with reflux esophagitis.
Wu JC; Cheung CM; Wong VW; Sung JJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Jun; 5(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 17481961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonerosive reflux disease.
Long JD; Orlando RC
Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol; 2007 Jun; 53(2):127-41. PubMed ID: 17557041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of antireflux surgery on oxidative stress of esophageal mucosa caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease: 4-yr follow-up study.
Rantanen TK; Räsänen JV; Sihvo EI; Ahotupa MO; Färkkilä MA; Salo JA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Feb; 101(2):222-8. PubMed ID: 16454822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Demographic, clinical, and psychological characteristics of the heartburn groups classified using the Rome III criteria and factors associated with the responsiveness to proton pump inhibitors in the gastroesophageal reflux disease group.
Lee KJ; Kwon HC; Cheong JY; Cho SW
Digestion; 2009; 79(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 19307735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective follow-up data from the ProGERD study suggest that GERD is not a categorial disease.
Labenz J; Nocon M; Lind T; Leodolter A; Jaspersen D; Meyer-Sabellek W; Stolte M; Vieth M; Willich SN; Malfertheiner P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2457-62. PubMed ID: 17029609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ineffective motility in lower third of esophagus. Length of involved esophagus and severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease].
Icaza ME; Soto JC; Pedroza J; Valdovinos MA
Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2003; 68(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 12940097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stratification and symptom characteristics of non-erosive reflux disease based on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux.
Xiong LS; Chen MH; Lin JK; Hu PJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 23(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 17924953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Non-erosive reflux disease in endoscopy and histopathology].
Błaszak A; Wojtuń S; Gil J; Wojtkowiak M; Dyrla P; Jałocha Ł; Dabek A; Kozłowski W
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 May; 26(155):399-402. PubMed ID: 19606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The nonerosive reflux disease-gastroesophageal reflux disease controversy.
Winter JW; Heading RC
Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 24(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 18622168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiac autonomic regulation differentiates reflux disease with and without erosive esophagitis.
Chen CL; Orr WC; Yang CC; Kuo TB
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):1001-6. PubMed ID: 16938711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal change esophagitis: prospective comparison of endoscopic and histological markers between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and normal controls using magnifying endoscopy.
Kiesslich R; Kanzler S; Vieth M; Moehler M; Neidig J; Thanka Nadar BJ; Schilling D; Burg J; Nafe B; Neurath MF; Galle PR
Dig Dis; 2004; 22(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 15383765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance differentiates gastroesophageal reflux disease from functional heartburn.
Kandulski A; Weigt J; Caro C; Jechorek D; Wex T; Malfertheiner P
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Jun; 13(6):1075-81. PubMed ID: 25496815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
