278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19580389)
1. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern.
Sculthorpe LD; Collin CA; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():78-86. PubMed ID: 18674520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic auditory change detection in humans is influenced by visual-auditory associative learning.
Laine M; Kwon MS; Hämäläinen H
Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1697-701. PubMed ID: 17921871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential.
Munka L; Berti S
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Apr; 396(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 16356637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors.
Zhang P; Chen X; Yuan P; Zhang D; He S
Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(2):715-24. PubMed ID: 16956775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity.
Restuccia D; Della Marca G; Marra C; Rubino M; Valeriani M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):891-9. PubMed ID: 16289727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes.
Yucel G; Petty C; McCarthy G; Belger A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16356321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "...and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli": the effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2142-52. PubMed ID: 16029961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP).
Pakarinen S; Takegata R; Rinne T; Huotilainen M; Näätänen R
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jan; 118(1):177-85. PubMed ID: 17070103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
Gherri E; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Attention-dependent allocation of auditory processing resources as measured by mismatch negativity.
Dittmann-Balcar A; Thienel R; Schall U
Neuroreport; 1999 Dec; 10(18):3749-53. PubMed ID: 10716203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
