These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19580681)

  • 21. Item and Test Analysis to Identify Quality Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) from an Assessment of Medical Students of Ahmedabad, Gujarat.
    Gajjar S; Sharma R; Kumar P; Rana M
    Indian J Community Med; 2014 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 24696535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Adding to the debate on the numbers of options for MCQs: the case for not being limited to MCQs with three, four or five options.
    Tweed M
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 Sep; 19(1):354. PubMed ID: 31521151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A psychometric analysis of a newly developed summative, multiple choice question assessment adapted from Canada to a Middle Eastern context.
    Pawluk SA; Shah K; Minhas R; Rainkie D; Wilby KJ
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018 Aug; 10(8):1026-1032. PubMed ID: 30314537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of 3- and 4-option multiple-choice items for medical subspecialty in-training examinations.
    Chen D; Harman AE; Sun H; Ye T; Gaiser RR
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 37106417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving multiple-choice questions to better assess dental student knowledge: distractor utilization in oral and maxillofacial pathology course examinations.
    McMahan CA; Pinckard RN; Prihoda TJ; Hendricson WD; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2013 Dec; 77(12):1593-609. PubMed ID: 24319131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The impact of item-writing flaws and item complexity on examination item difficulty and discrimination value.
    Rush BR; Rankin DC; White BJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):250. PubMed ID: 27681933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
    Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia.
    Al Ameer AY
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50441. PubMed ID: 38222171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
    Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation into the optimal number of distractors in single-best answer exams.
    Kilgour JM; Tayyaba S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Aug; 21(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 26597452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stepping up of MCQs' quality through a multi-stage reviewing process.
    Khafagy G; Ahmed M; Saad N
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Jul; 27(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 27315633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Cognitive levels and Item writing flaws in Medical Pharmacology Internal Assessment Examinations.
    Tariq S; Tariq S; Maqsood S; Jawed S; Baig M
    Pak J Med Sci; 2017; 33(4):866-870. PubMed ID: 29067055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Role of Faculty Development in Improving the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in Dental Education.
    Shaikh S; Kannan SK; Naqvi ZA; Pasha Z; Ahamad M
    J Dent Educ; 2020 Mar; 84(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 32176343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. AI in medical education: uses of AI in construction type A MCQs.
    Rezigalla AA
    BMC Med Educ; 2024 Mar; 24(1):247. PubMed ID: 38448870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
    Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the effect of items' format and type on psychometric properties of sixth year pharmacy students clinical clerkship assessment items.
    AlKhatib HS; Brazeau G; Akour A; Almuhaissen SA
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jun; 20(1):190. PubMed ID: 32532278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.