These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19581069)

  • 1. Adaptive Conjoint Analysis as individual preference assessment tool: feasibility through the internet and reliability of preferences.
    Pieterse AH; Berkers F; Baas-Thijssen MC; Marijnen CA; Stiggelbout AM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Feb; 78(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19581069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions.
    Sepucha K; Ozanne E; Silvia K; Partridge A; Mulley AG
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 17023138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Loh A; Simon D; Wills CE; Kriston L; Niebling W; Härter M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Aug; 67(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 17509808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preferences for outcomes of treatment for rectal cancer: patient and clinician utilities and their application in an interactive computer-based decision aid.
    Masya LM; Young JM; Solomon MJ; Harrison JD; Dennis RJ; Salkeld GP
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1994-2002. PubMed ID: 19934920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do patients' communication behaviors provide insight into their preferences for participation in decision making?
    Hudak PL; Frankel RM; Braddock C; Nisenbaum R; Luca P; McKeever C; Levinson W
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 18480043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferences for treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure: symptoms versus survival.
    Stanek EJ; Oates MB; McGhan WF; Denofrio D; Loh E
    J Card Fail; 2000 Sep; 6(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 10997749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.
    Rodriguez KL; Appelt CJ; Switzer GE; Sonel AF; Arnold RM
    Heart Lung; 2008; 37(6):440-8. PubMed ID: 18992627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making generally and in hormone replacement and urinary incontinence treatment decision-making specifically.
    O'Donnell M; Hunskaar S
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Nov; 68(3):243-51. PubMed ID: 17904327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring the black box of a decision aid: what information do patients select from an interactive Cd-Rom on treatment options in breast cancer?
    Molenaar S; Sprangers M; Oort F; Rutgers E; Luiten E; Mulder J; van Meeteren M; de Haes H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):122-30. PubMed ID: 16945498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patients' preferences for receiving clinical information and participating in decision-making in Iran.
    Asghari F; Mirzazadeh A; Fotouhi A
    J Med Ethics; 2008 May; 34(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 18448714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.
    Florin J; Ehrenberg A; Ehnfors M
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Dec; 15(12):1498-508. PubMed ID: 17118072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical decision-making: Patients' preferences and experiences.
    Murray E; Pollack L; White M; Lo B
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Feb; 65(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16956742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients' preferences for shared decision making in general practice.
    Schneider A; Körner T; Mehring M; Wensing M; Elwyn G; Szecsenyi J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 May; 61(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 15896943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the treatment tradeoff method in rectal cancer patients: is surgery preference related to outcome utilities?
    Bossema ER; Marijnen CA; Baas-Thijssen MC; van de Velde CJ; Stiggelbout AM
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):888-98. PubMed ID: 18519887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodologic evaluation of adaptive conjoint analysis to assess patient preferences: an application in oncology.
    Pieterse AH; Stiggelbout AM; Marijnen CA
    Health Expect; 2010 Dec; 13(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 20550594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression.
    Loh A; Leonhart R; Wills CE; Simon D; Härter M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17141112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring men's preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right.
    Gattellari M; Ward JE
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Jun; 11(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 15869554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument.
    Elit LM; Levine MN; Gafni A; Whelan TJ; Doig G; Streiner DL; Rosen B
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Sep; 62(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 8812525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Development of a questionnaire to assess treatment representations in rehabilitation patients].
    Glattacker M; Heyduck K; Meffert C
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2009 Dec; 48(6):345-53. PubMed ID: 20069518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.