130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1958150)
1. The third age. Documentation for the RCI.
Hurst C
Aust Nurses J; 1991 Sep; 21(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 1958150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Nurses 'disturbed' by new regulations.
Occup Health Saf; 1989 Mar; 58(3):12-3. PubMed ID: 2710464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.
Cornu-Quinn C
Am Nurse; 1994; 26(7):5, 28. PubMed ID: 8067641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Constitutional complaint rejected].
Pflege Z; 2016 Apr; 69(4):197. PubMed ID: 27218130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An open letter to RANF members from the Federal Minister for Housing and Aged Care.
Staples P
Aust Nurses J; 1988 Jul; 18(1):4-6. PubMed ID: 3202725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hang on to your rights when faced with a sell-off.
Buswell C
Nurs Times; 2000 Jul; 96(30 Suppl):11-2. PubMed ID: 11963428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ABC's Lateline mid-July on residential aged care.
Thomas L
Aust Nurs J; 2013 Aug; 21(2):1. PubMed ID: 24003466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
Oreg Nurse; 1994 Dec; 59(4):suppl E1. PubMed ID: 7724201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Think before you search.
Northrop CE
Nursing; 1987 Jul; 17(7):59. PubMed ID: 3648549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court rules NLRB erred re "supervisory nurses".
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):1. PubMed ID: 8066179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Baden-Württemberg curtails specialist quota. Requests for personnel will be revised].
Pflege Z; 2016 Mar; 69(3):134. PubMed ID: 27182578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. Supreme Court decision of N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
Pendergast J; Wagner B
Stat; 1994 Jul; 63(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 8029822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Failing to chart can cost you your job! Case in point: Alexander v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources (484 So. 2d 722-LA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 May; 26(12):4. PubMed ID: 3636939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of nursing director under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
Calfe B
Director; 1996; 4(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 9095824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nursing home 'understaffed' death results: damages awarded. Case on point: Rose Care Inc. v. Ross, 2005 WL 1283679 S.W.3d-AR.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2005 Jun; 46(1):2. PubMed ID: 16047730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Blowing the whistle on co-workers. Case in point: Gay v. William Hill Manor (536 A. 2d 690(1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):4. PubMed ID: 3368576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Aged care set for changes.
Jones D
Aust Nurs J; 1997 Feb; 4(7):17. PubMed ID: 9069799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Living with OBRA--nutritional assessment and review.
Matthews LE
J Nutr Elder; 1993; 12(3):71-5. PubMed ID: 8277417
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Nursing Home Reform Act: impact on nurses who practice in nursing facilities.
Maben PA
Kans Nurse; 1990 Apr; 65(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 2362398
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
