376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19582259)
1. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
Baik CY; Ververidou M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Airway volume for different dentofacial skeletal patterns.
El H; Palomo JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e511-21. PubMed ID: 21640863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of Dental and Skeletal Malocclusions in Sagittal Plane among Saudi Orthodontic Patients.
Al-Hamlan N; Al-Eissa B; Al-Hiyasat AS; Albalawi FS; Ahmed AE
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 26162253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pharyngeal airway characterization in adolescents related to facial skeletal pattern: a preliminary study.
Claudino LV; Mattos CT; Ruellas AC; Sant' Anna EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):799-809. PubMed ID: 23726330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between the angle of the coronoid process of the mandible and the electromyographic activity of the temporal muscle in skeletal Class I and III individuals.
Amorim MM; Borini CB; de Castro Lopes SL; de Oliveira Tosello D; Bérzin F; Caria PH
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Aug; 37(8):596-603. PubMed ID: 20529175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of adult Class III malocclusions with orthodontic therapy or orthognathic surgery: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Tseng YC; Pan CY; Chou ST; Liao CY; Lai ST; Chen CM; Chang HP; Yang YH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):e485-93. PubMed ID: 21536190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys.
Kerr WJ; Miller S; Ayme B; Wilhelm N
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8059745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
Iwasawa T; Shimizu N; Yamauchi E; Yamada W; Fujiwara K
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
Kerr WJ; Ford I
Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
