148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19582396)
1. The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions.
Burns KE; Zubrinich C; Marshall J; Cook D
Intensive Care Med; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 19582396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Substitute decisions about genetic testing in critical care research: a glimpse behind the curtain.
Lavery JV; Slutsky AS
Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):1257-9. PubMed ID: 16550080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Surrogate consent for genomics research in intensive care.
Shelton AK; Fish AF; Cobb JP; Bachman JA; Jenkins RL; Battistich V; Freeman BD
Am J Crit Care; 2009 Sep; 18(5):418-26; quiz 427. PubMed ID: 19723862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental permission for pilot newborn screening research: guidelines from the NBSTRN.
Botkin JR; Lewis MH; Watson MS; Swoboda KJ; Anderson R; Berry SA; Bonhomme N; Brosco JP; Comeau AM; Goldenberg A; Goldman E; Therrell B; Levy-Fisch J; Tarini B; Wilfond B;
Pediatrics; 2014 Feb; 133(2):e410-7. PubMed ID: 24394680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical considerations in consenting critically ill patients for bedside clinical care and research.
Rincon F; Lee K
J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Mar; 30(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 24019298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fifteen-minute consultation: an evidence-based approach to research without prior consent (deferred consent) in neonatal and paediatric critical care trials.
Woolfall K; Frith L; Dawson A; Gamble C; Lyttle MD; ; Young B
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed; 2016 Feb; 101(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 26464416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical illness research involving collection of genomic data: the conundrum posed by low levels of genomic literacy among surrogate decision makers for critically ill patients.
Iverson E; Celious A; Shehane E; Oerke M; Warren V; Eastman A; Kennedy CR; Freeman BD
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Jul; 8(3):53-7. PubMed ID: 23933776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individualism and the ethics of research on humans.
Wilkinson TM
HEC Forum; 2004 Mar; 16(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 15181667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US and UK policies governing research with humans.
Maschke KJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2003 Dec; 171(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 14615878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Community permission for medical research in developing countries.
Diallo DA; Doumbo OK; Plowe CV; Wellems TE; Emanuel EJ; Hurst SA
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jul; 41(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 15983925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective.
Freeman BD; Kennedy CR; Coopersmith CM; Zehnbauer BA; Buchman TG
Crit Care Med; 2006 Apr; 34(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 16484903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enrolling subjects by exception from consent versus proxy consent in trauma care research.
Wright DW; Clark PL; Pentz RD; Hertzberg V; Kellermann AL
Ann Emerg Med; 2008 Apr; 51(4):355-60, 360.e1-3. PubMed ID: 17933428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is best interests a relevant decision making standard for enrolling non-capacitated subjects into clinical research?
Berger JT
J Med Ethics; 2011 Jan; 37(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 20952491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent in critical care trials: a survey of Canadian research ethics boards and critical care researchers.
Duffett M; Burns KE; Kho ME; Lauzier F; Meade MO; Arnold DM; Adhikari NKJ; Lamontagne F; Cook DJ;
J Crit Care; 2011 Oct; 26(5):533.e11-533.e22. PubMed ID: 21376518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible.
Jansen TC; Kompanje EJ; Bakker J
Crit Care Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1 Suppl):S65-8. PubMed ID: 19104227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. When, why, and how to conduct research in child and adolescent psychiatry: practical and ethical considerations.
Chen DT; Shepherd LL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 32(2):361-80. PubMed ID: 19486819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.
Bigatello LM; George E; Hurford WE
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S178-81. PubMed ID: 12626965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Observational study of parental opinion of deferred consent for neonatal research.
Sloss S; Dawson JA; McGrory L; Rafferty AR; Davis PG; Owen LS
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2021 May; 106(3):258-264. PubMed ID: 33127737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surrogate consent for dementia research: a national survey of older Americans.
Kim SY; Kim HM; Langa KM; Karlawish JH; Knopman DS; Appelbaum PS
Neurology; 2009 Jan; 72(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 19139366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patients' and surrogates' perspective on research and testing in critical care.
Rubulotta F
Crit Care Med; 2007 Jan; 35(1):328; author reply 328-9. PubMed ID: 17197795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
